| Image |
Comment |
| 07/21/2004 03:24:56 PM |
For Your Approvalby michaelkComment by ddng: A nice idea but it just doesn't do it for me. The foreground is probably a little too out of focus for my liking. |
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/21/2004 02:30:58 PM |
|
| 07/21/2004 01:35:04 PM |
|
| 07/21/2004 05:18:57 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/21/2004 02:11:47 AM |
For Your Approvalby michaelkComment by aguinn: i think just the fudge-scape without the sign would have been better- as the lighting really highlights the rough textures. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/07/2004 04:38:52 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/07/2004 01:49:33 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/05/2004 01:06:22 PM |
Thomas And Mack After Darkby michaelkComment by hsteg: Nice shot, but I think itd be better with a wider angle, and if those lights were turned down a little but. You probably didnt hvae control of the lights, so Im not going to subtract points for that. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2004 10:45:23 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2004 12:34:40 AM |
Thomas And Mack After Darkby michaelkComment by banmorn: Seems to need a slight CW rotation. Nice exposure, good choice of angle and I like the colors. Could do without the glare of the lights at the left, but I would assume that it might have been unavoidalbe to get the exposure you got. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 02:54:43 PM EDT.
