Image |
Comment |
| 07/28/2002 02:41:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by Gracious: Although it is a loved object, it doesn't have universal appeal. It does have texture, and obviously a dimension unseen by the casual observer. Lighting is good. It looks sad, being hunched over. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/26/2002 11:50:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by GeneralE: I think I'd try and avoid the blinds to enhance the issusion that it the ground and not a bedspread. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/26/2002 12:42:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by nards656: Hard to vote now that we all know what this is.... :-) 5 nards656 |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/25/2002 11:49:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by sheyingshi88: So finally I get to 'Kermit':) Yes, I can see where the titile might be a bit ambiguous and allow some people to think too much. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/25/2002 08:03:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by KarenB: The lighting is good, but the subject freaks me out...I really did think someone was in there!...no matter how I laughed at the comments in the forum! :-) Karen Bryan |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/25/2002 04:59:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by carlosm: what the hell is this? It looks like a person wrapped in a potato sack.. not exactly what I would call a "loved" posture! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/24/2002 08:55:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by Gotcha: Hmmmm, Mr. Kermi, Latin = Phuntus Manamus - I wouldn't sleep with this thing (with all due respect to the Kerminator). - Good luck Lisa |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/24/2002 06:00:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by Swashbuckler: Lisa, I am commenting after reading "the thread". I started this shot with a 7. Not knowing what it was, didn't really matter to me. This shot has everything I look for in B&W (dislike the concept, but it's too popular to bad mouth often), the shot has great contrast, sharp/clear focus. On that issue, it's VERY NICE. The outer covering shows good detail, so the texture is very obvious. On the humorous side, even with your "explaination", I still don't see the frog! Because this shot has been discussed at legnth, during the voting, I am going to NOT change my original scoring. You started with a 7, end with a 7. Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/24/2002 03:59:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by myqyl: You know... my wife SAID this was a frog... I'm not going to scare you with the list of what I thought it was. I gave it a 7 before I saw the thread and I'll leave it there. I liked the backlite (though the window doesn't really help)... Tell you what though, I'll give it an 8 if you promise never to post the color version :) Sounds real scary ~ But that's just me |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/24/2002 03:38:00 PM |
Lovedby FrooberComment by karmat: I had no clue until you posted in the forums. I'm still not sure . . . . . . hahaha Black and white works well, I think, and other aspects of the picture are good too. It's just a weird subject. :-) karmat |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/21/2025 05:42:02 PM EDT.