The door in the wall, De Angeli, Marguerite
by kevrobertson

Comment by whatdewuc:
An eyegrabber that door is.

The door in the wall, De Angeli, Marguerite
by kevrobertson

Comment by Katspetkat:
Do you ever wonder if those other arches, the ones on either side were ever doorways as well. I always wonder that when I see this architecture. The color on the stone is an interesting contrast to the wood of the door.

The door in the wall, De Angeli, Marguerite
by kevrobertson

Comment by jfwolpert:
nice composition

The door in the wall, De Angeli, Marguerite
by kevrobertson

Comment by ShutterPug:
Very cool high-contrast study.

The door in the wall, De Angeli, Marguerite
by kevrobertson

Comment by Jutilda:
Nice but I'd adjust the tilt - it is ever so slightly leaning to the right.

Olga 1924
by kevrobertson

Comment by posthumous:
If this is really from 1924 I think you're going to be dq'd. but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and score you high for a compelling portrait.

Olga 1924
by kevrobertson

Comment by LindaLee:
I normally vote all the way through before I begin to comment, but had to comment on this now. It looks almost like a magazine or newpaper photo that has been scanned. I'm not certain about the processing you may have used for this shot, but I am certain that I do not care for it. The photo is generally very soft, and to me, messy looking; and her eyes are absolutely dead center, which I also do not care for. My eyes are drawn more to all the "stuff" in the photo, than to the subject itself. Had this been a crisp candid, especially if you could really see her eyes well, I would have given it a better score. 5

Olga 1924
by kevrobertson

Comment by saiphfire:
the face is great, but it's so low quality (it looks like a picture of a newspaper clipping)

Olga 1924
by kevrobertson

Comment by reevey:
I can see someone's been experimenting with effects in Photoshop... doesn't do it for me, sorry!

Olga 1924
by kevrobertson

Comment by Xilebo:
The newspaper effect and noise is rather typical for 1924, a little excessive imo though..like the expression