morrels
by sns

Comment by e301:
Oops. I'm not convinced about the shot anyway, leaving aside the challenge; it would seem to me that the variation in these shapes cries out exactly for a deep depth of field rather than this shallow one - had they been identical objects, and had you arranged them so that therre was more progression through the field of focus, then perhaps it would work. 3 - mainly for missing the challenge.

morrels
by sns

Comment by jus6681:
keyword, deep

morrels
by sns

Comment by doctornick:
uh this is Shallow DOF.

morrels
by sns

Comment by awpollard:
I believe you misunderstood wide dof. This is a very nice picture however. I like it.

morrels
by sns

Comment by kevrobertson:
Doesn't suggest Deep DOF to me.
Good luck though

morrels
by sns

Comment by photom:
Nice composition, good subject (yummy), and good lighting. But unfortunatly a very shallow DoF.

morrels
by sns

Comment by ChrisW123:
Uh oh, you've probably heard this already, but this is shallow dof, not deep. :(

morrels
by sns

Comment by TLL061:
wheres the dof ?

morrels
by sns

Comment by melismatica:
This does not show Deep depth of field. It shows shallow depth of field. Deep depth of field is when the background is in focus to infinity. It's an interesting subject but I don't think this is the best approach to photographing such texturally interesting objects. Try lighting it from the side to capture all the nooks more dramatically. Also, try moving in closer so that the mushrooms become more significant to the frame.

morrels
by sns

Comment by theSaj:
Ah....another later entry for the "Threes" competition...eh?