Pure Gold Melting (look at from a distance, one meter - Brown sugar macro)
by siggi

Comment by seanami:
That's a really neat texture.

Pure Gold Melting (look at from a distance, one meter - Brown sugar macro)
by siggi

Comment by MrAkamai:
Even with the title explanation, I do not understand what it is I am looking at other than a brownish blob, sorry.

Additional comments:
Now that I know what it is I am viewing, I can barely make out individual crystals of sugar. I still see evidence of compression and/or grain and noise from a high ISO setting.

Pure Gold Melting (look at from a distance, one meter - Brown sugar macro)
by siggi

Comment by Dr.Confuser:
I like the color and crystaline structure. If I look at it from a distance, it's like looking up at the sun through fall folliage. To me though, the overall effect is noisy. I think you tried to help with the title, but it seems like you tried to stretch a so so photo with the title. Lots of threads talk about how the photo should stand alone and that the title won't make the photo. If I find myself agonizing too much over a title I try to stop short and ask myself whether the photo is capable of standing on its own.

Pure Gold Melting (look at from a distance, one meter - Brown sugar macro)
by siggi

Comment by heida:
I usually hate titles that has explanations in it, but this one was funny it made me stand up :) yeah kinda looks like gold from one meter away hehe, I think its a good background picture, could be a bit sharper mabey, but the light and dark make for a good picture to use in design, doesnt hold up much interest on its own, especially since you cant really tell what it is, But you told me its brown sugar :) Good luck :)

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by DragonStar:
I hope that really didn't happen! Anyway, personally I think that an angle more from the front would have created a more effective shot. Perhaps even from the other side to get rid of some of the empty space (not sure what was on side you were shooting from obviously so that may not have been an option).

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by seanami:
Wow, did this really happen? I don't know how you could stage this photo!

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by blindjustice:
Very interesting but the building and the people ruin the shot a bit. CLone them out perhaps. I like the flowers in the front. If you laid down in those flowers and pointed the camera up, it would be a picture as if the plane was in the air!

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by airatic:
I have to take points off for spelling and grammar in your headline, but this image meets the challenge sufficiently. More people around the plane or on the course might have benefited the image.

EDIT:
In this particular contest, the headline is an important part of the challenge. If English is not your native language, I would rather you wrote the headline properly in your native tongue than write a nonsensical headline in English. We had plenty of time in this challenge to formulate a strong headline. As it stood, your picture was not strong enough to "fly" without a solid headline, and your headline was too befuddled to make up for the ambivalent photo. A newspaper photo should make the situation obvious, the headline is more like the title of the article than a description of the picture.

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by scottwilson:
So is that really a golf course or did you put a flag at the end of a grass runway? Either way the photo works fairly well. It would have been nice to have a couple of golfer putting on the green.

Landed on a golf course dangerously low on fule!
by siggi

Comment by djscarrd:
I think you got fule spelled wrong. Anyway, composition could've been better. I would've taken it at an angle instead of a 45degree shot from the side.