rose
by spease

Comment by LevT:
there is no bokeh here, just a uniform background

rose
by spease

Comment by dwterry:
I don't know that this really qualifies for "bokeh", but it's a gorgeous image!

rose
by spease

Comment by charmayne:
While the backround color works well with your foreground subject I don't see enough bokah to inhance your image as I interpret this challenge.

rose
by spease

Comment by Montereykiddo:
There is absolutely 100% no bokeh in this picture! Nice shot, but not apropriate. If you had capture these flowers in a garden with out of focus shapes in the background to enhance your subject, it could have worked.

rose
by spease

Comment by NeoScales:
Don't see the boken? Could be me though....

rose
by spease

Comment by ahaze:
The short definition of Bokeh from KenRockwell.com, which I am using for voting on this challenge: "Bokeh describes the rendition of out-of-focus points of light." To me this image does not show bokeh well at all. Is the subject enhanced by the bokeh of the background? Based on the previous statement, no. Lovely roses though.

Torry hunter
by spease

Comment by gloda:
You should have chosen a real person. Your figurine isn't even hidden very well. It looks as if you submitted a picture just for the sake of participating, without any efforts. Sorry if that sounds harsh. 2.

Torry hunter
by spease

Comment by Dseale:
lol

dolly caught
by spease

Comment by cloudsme:
IMO doesn't meet challenge.

dolly caught
by spease

Comment by Dr.Confuser:
It may be that you won't agree with me, but in my mind "candid" implies a photograph of a person at a candid (i.e. unaware of the camera) moment. So, to that way of thinking, this doesn't really meet the challenge.