Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by Firstrich1:
In Camera effect? ok...I give up how did you do it:)

Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by Neuferland:
What a cute idea! Turn your head for a second and WHAM, part of one is missing or in my house, the whole pile would be gone, LOL!

I like this idea but the cookies would have looked better on a plate instead of the paper towel or even a plain napkin, no distracting patterns. The light is also a bit harsh, though well distributed on both sides, I'm betting a split screen shot, my Olympus can do that also, it's a fun feature to use sometimes. A 6

divergence of good scents
by wkmen

Comment by jgal76:
Interesting effect, but neither picture does much to hold my interest for long. Possibly a better background would help.

Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by jmritz:
This happens to me all the time. What's going on?

divergence of good scents
by wkmen

Comment by vrphotos:
To many things going on. divergence appears to diverse. I find neither subject to be shown in all its potential glory. Gutsy challenge though i'm sure it wasnt easy.

Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by magnus:
How is this supposed to convey the feeling of surprise? 3

divergence of good scents
by wkmen

Comment by ogdenm:
Too distracting

Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by rjhawkin:
dispite being validated, it looks to much like a photochop effect. even if it was done on the camera.

Snack time - Hey who did that?
by wkmen

Comment by e301:
A few questions to explain the low vote i'm giving: did you think about what to use for the background, and did you think about removing the crumbs? Did you think about using the on-board flash or using a desk-light or something less harsh? did you think about making the intial composition simpler, so that the difference might be more immediately obvious?

divergence of good scents
by wkmen

Comment by SharQ:
Very curious how you did this within the rules of the challenge. Looks pretty good, but lacks focus. either of the pictures work separately, but together it is a bit pointless. (6)