| Image |
Comment |
| 07/01/2025 10:24:02 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/21/2025 02:02:26 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/20/2025 02:55:30 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/20/2025 10:50:51 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/20/2025 05:00:58 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/17/2025 02:47:51 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/16/2025 05:22:03 AM |
Rowby BarronessComment by JulietNN: This is just my opinion, but using the filter is fine, but if you use it I would do it delicately and boost up the contrast, it will make a world of difference to your water depths, and again on your any and trees , masking off those three areas and brining delicate but more or less pronounced would give you the floaty wispy feel and not just one overall filter look Just my 2 cents xox |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/10/2025 03:35:12 PM |
Rowby BarronessComment by mariuca: Since I seldom mark an image with a 4, I think I have to say why.
Personally, I dislike profoundly these types of filter and I do not think they belong to an artistic photography. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/10/2025 01:15:31 PM |
|
| 06/10/2025 11:17:36 AM |
Untitledby BarronessComment by bobnospum: Nice portrait. I am not sure it really works as a negative. Us old film users saw images like this for decades on our negatives. Perhaps having a more detailed background or a pattern on his shirt would give it more impact. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/27/2025 06:25:45 AM EST.