| Image |
Comment |
| 05/04/2012 05:34:09 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time! by Alex_PetriniComment by gyaban: Congratulations Alessandro. I enjoyed looking at the outtakes and video, it looks like you had much fun here :-) And the result is beautiful. |
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 05:05:41 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 04:52:29 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by Chinarosepetal: Originally posted by Alexkc:
Originally posted by Chinarosepetal:
Originally posted by Alexkc:
Originally posted by Chinarosepetal:
Nice picture but I would call it background motion blur, not panning. :) |
Can you explain me the difference? |
Yes, the camera and the model have a static relationship with each other, the camera does not need to be moved to follow the subject. They are essentially in their own fixed world with the background moving around them. :) |
Ok. Who decided that this is not panning while following a subject from a stationary position is panning? No one explained me that. |
I'm just saying what I would call it, others will have different ideas. :) |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 04:35:57 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by Alex_Petrini: Originally posted by Chinarosepetal:
Originally posted by Alexkc:
Originally posted by Chinarosepetal:
Nice picture but I would call it background motion blur, not panning. :) |
Can you explain me the difference? |
Yes, the camera and the model have a static relationship with each other, the camera does not need to be moved to follow the subject. They are essentially in their own fixed world with the background moving around them. :) |
Ok. Who decided that this is not panning while following a subject from a stationary position is panning? No one explained me that. |
| 05/04/2012 04:31:03 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by Chinarosepetal: Originally posted by Alexkc:
Originally posted by Chinarosepetal:
Nice picture but I would call it background motion blur, not panning. :) |
Can you explain me the difference? |
Yes, the camera and the model have a static relationship with each other, the camera does not need to be moved to follow the subject. They are essentially in their own fixed world with the background moving around them. :) |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 03:28:40 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by RianBotes: Alex... You have my vote as meeting the challenge spot on...Congrats!! The blue tells the story better than what you could in your presentation... |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 02:21:00 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by ace flyman: Congrats on a awesome image & the Blue. I was leaning more towards motion blur vs panning blur. Yet if the camera is spinning the camera is panning, so It meets the challenge right on for me..... Great Job!!! |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 01:33:20 PM |
|
| 05/04/2012 01:23:21 PM |
5 p.m. - Tea time!by Alex_PetriniComment by LevT: Congrats Alessandro! It is certainly a nice panning shot, which is correctly defined in the challenge description as a sharp subject against motion-blurred background. How it is achieved is up to the photographer :). |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2012 01:02:49 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 02:52:42 PM EDT.
