Image |
Comment |
| 03/04/2015 12:24:31 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 10:46:36 AM |
With a little help from your friend by PaulComment by blindjustice: Originally posted by LanndonKane: Originally posted by Paul: Originally posted by Lydia: I'm not at all into the whole lesbian thing, but the colors and light here are gorgeous. 9 |
I thank you for your generous vote but I certainly don't see any 'lesbian thing' going on here. It's just an extension of one figure nude into two figure nudes - it was the continuation of form, and in this case function, we were after. It's a tricky modelling feat to give great shapes under load like this. Some from this short set had more interesting angled poses but this one had the best 'lightbulb' hand and gave emphasis to the challenge theme. I could have done a similar shot clothed - it would have been different but probably still effective; it's just not how it worked out within the wider set, but I don't think the nudity (within the depicted context) says anything about sexual orientation. Why would it? |
yeah, seriously... |
In a sense, I believe you and agree with you Paul. These are women models, nudes, and although there is undeniable overt sexuality to the photograph, there is nothing to suggest lesbianism, no stereotypes, no modern love scene of a shot: simply art- or to prudes, "candy photography." Message edited by author 2015-03-04 10:47:04. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 09:09:15 AM |
With a little help from your friend by PaulComment by LanndonKane: Originally posted by Paul: Originally posted by Lydia: I'm not at all into the whole lesbian thing, but the colors and light here are gorgeous. 9 |
I thank you for your generous vote but I certainly don't see any 'lesbian thing' going on here. It's just an extension of one figure nude into two figure nudes - it was the continuation of form, and in this case function, we were after. It's a tricky modelling feat to give great shapes under load like this. Some from this short set had more interesting angled poses but this one had the best 'lightbulb' hand and gave emphasis to the challenge theme. I could have done a similar shot clothed - it would have been different but probably still effective; it's just not how it worked out within the wider set, but I don't think the nudity (within the depicted context) says anything about sexual orientation. Why would it? |
yeah, seriously... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 08:16:28 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 07:30:09 AM |
With a little help from your friend by PaulComment by nygold: Congrats on your yellow, I'm happy my 10 didn't go to waste.
Can the SC do an investigation on people who always vote 1 on nudes? :)
(I'm not at all into the whole lesbian thing) Lydia's comment is really shocking, I'm going
to chalk it up as her trying to be funny and it didn't work. Message edited by author 2015-03-04 07:30:43. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 04:03:45 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 03:38:10 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 01:52:54 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2015 12:59:46 AM |
With a little help from your friend by PaulComment by Paul: Originally posted by Lydia: I'm not at all into the whole lesbian thing, but the colors and light here are gorgeous. 9 |
I thank you for your generous vote but I certainly don't see any 'lesbian thing' going on here. It's just an extension of one figure nude into two figure nudes - it was the continuation of form, and in this case function, we were after. It's a tricky modelling feat to give great shapes under load like this. Some from this short set had more interesting angled poses but this one had the best 'lightbulb' hand and gave emphasis to the challenge theme. I could have done a similar shot clothed - it would have been different but probably still effective; it's just not how it worked out within the wider set, but I don't think the nudity (within the depicted context) says anything about sexual orientation. Why would it? |
| 03/04/2015 12:29:20 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 07:00:47 PM EDT.