| Image | Comment | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:51:32 PM | 
| Why do we care so little?by  Bruce_the_RobertComment: overexposure, good idea. Sometimes Ugliness does ask the question why, but I think the photo would benefit from a darker feel.
 I am not a good photographer, I do not claim to be, any criticism is meant to be constructive criticism...... | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:49:50 PM | 
| Why must it taste so good?by  ccaComment: Out of focus. good idea. work on the execution.
 I am not a good photographer, I do not claim to be better, any criticism is meant to be constructive criticism...... | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:47:08 PM | 
| Why listen?by  losemeComment: Crop the bottom of the picture off and it would be better.. | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:35:08 PM | 
| Bouquetby  md8speedComment: Very nice. Great color. My only criticism is the two purple flowers in the back. Maybe a little too dark for the photo. Some nice lavender, or red may have been better. Much better than anything I have ever done though, so take it as you may. 9........... Update: After completion of the voting, this is my favorite photo in the competition, by far. My pick for the blue. | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:32:57 PM | 
| Washing Ashoreby  senor_kasperComment: Very nice, my only question is where is the non stationary lighting? 8, I will give the benefit of the doubt. | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:30:48 PM | 
| Mysterious Glow ( painting technique - light on the sky )  by  DziuggyComment: hmmm. Nice photo. I will give the benefit of the doubt and guess that the light source is non stationary (Maybe someone in the woods with a powerful flashlight), I hope I am right. 8. Oh, there is also some sensor dust at the top left. Still a nice photo though. | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:27:46 PM | 
| Hole In One!by  psullivanComment: I think the light source is supposed to be non-stationary. Now, I know that the sun is not stationary (It moves through the universe) but I do not think that is what the idea was. Nice sunset though.... | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 06/07/2007 01:03:31 PM | 
| Compact Discolightby  egpieperComment: Sorry, but I do not like it. Not an appealing subject, High ISO noise....Just does not do it for me... | 
|  | 06/07/2007 12:25:12 PM | 
| Timeby  EvanHComment: Not a bad picture, but I think the best part of it is the painting that is being held. The picture is well executed though. 6 | 
|  | 06/07/2007 12:23:50 PM | 
| Life Amongst the Rubbleby  shalrathComment: I love the flowers, I think one of the best examples of "light painting" yet. If there is a downside to this, it is the rest of the picture. Overall, very good though. 8 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
	
	
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/30/2025 09:13:55 PM EDT.