Image |
Comment |
| 11/16/2008 05:48:47 AM |
Peacockby NuzzerComment: Love the omposition, focus and dof are spot on, and exposure seems good. What does seem to be missing is a sense of vibrancy and clarity. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:46:11 AM |
The Blue Cupby toddheadComment: Took me a while to spot it, but now I have I can't believe I didn't see it straight away! A good group photo. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:26:47 AM |
Blue Streakby margetts91Comment: I rather like this - the play of light , especially with the encroaching shadow to the right, is really interesting. |
| 11/16/2008 05:25:44 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:25:13 AM |
Blueberryby AlainComment: Dun't look very blue to me! That aside, a photo I like a lot. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:24:30 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:24:07 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 05:23:33 AM |
Blue Zoneby VariationFilmsComment: This just doesn't work for me. I can see that the play of light on the drops may have drawn you to the subject, but I don't find the end product either appealing or sufficiently interesting. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/16/2008 02:32:44 AM |
Memphis Bluesby SchmeldontinoComment: Hello from the Critique Club.
Certainly an interesting old building; I always find old painted advertising intriguing.
The photo is a record shot, and for these to succeed well in competition they do need to be technically perfect. The composition is ok, but there is nothing dynamic about it; I see that you took this from a bus, and to a certain extent that does come across. The exposure is fine, although you might like to consider some selective dodging and burning of the paint and brickwork to enhance the detail even more - although you may feel that would take away the 'authenticity' of the photo. The sky appears fairly noisy - two possible reasons: a. initial incorrect exposure rescued in LR, or b. as a result of the 400 ISO. If it is as a result of the ISO - and I don't know how your camera performs here, I would have been tempted to increase the aperture to around f5.6 and drop the ISO to 200. The building is pretty much flat to the photographer, and as such doesn't require a large depth of field.
My over-all impressions are of a competent, although some-what uninspiring record shot that doesn't really make me want to linger. Hopefully I have given you some ideas on how you could approach the same subject were you to take the photo again. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a PM. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/15/2008 02:38:40 PM |
feeling blueby allamericanwoman4Comment: A nice idea for the challenge, but the end result falls a little short. The lack of sharp focus and the high levels of noise would suggest that this was taken hand-held with a slowish shutter speed. A lower ISO, and even slower shutter-speed either tripod mounted, or securely balanced would, I am sure, have produced a better result. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/18/2025 06:42:35 PM EDT.