| Image |
Comment |
| 04/15/2011 12:27:13 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/15/2011 12:26:54 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/15/2011 12:26:27 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/15/2011 12:18:45 AM |
feetby ursulaComment: Originally posted by MargaretN: I gave it 7 but would not guess it was yours! Very interesting :) |
It is good to find out that on occasion I still can go incognito :) I like that. Thank you. Message edited by author 2011-04-15 00:19:24. |
| 04/12/2011 09:16:41 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/11/2011 12:31:58 AM |
Detoxification by PaulComment: My only 10 in the challenge, it is a beautiful picture! I'm glad it ribboned. Congratulations. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/11/2011 12:05:35 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2011 07:04:59 PM |
brycecanyonby KristinaGComment: A question, so what you did is take the two images and use a portion of each for the final, the sky portion of one, the land portion of the other? I'm trying to think, and I don't mean it nasty or anything, but I'm trying to remember: is that HDR? I mean, is work like this considered HDR work? This makes me want to eat my words about the light looking a bit flat, as so many HDR images tend to look. I mean, if the land portion is one photo and the sky portion another, same scene, different exposures, then if anything looks flat it doesn't have anything to do with HDR. Or maybe it doens't even look flat. Now I don't trust myself at all anymore :)
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2011 12:37:02 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2011 12:35:23 PM |
brycecanyonby KristinaGComment: Nice, in particular the bottom 2/3rds of the image. The sky not quite so much; it looks blown, with funny contrasts. The picture still has that flattish HDR feel to it, even though it doesn't look fake. Somehow, to my mind, there needs to be a light adjustment after the HDR to counter this tendency of HDR to make things look too even.
I think one of the things that HDR does is bring out "flaws" in the image that you might overlook otherwise. In this image, the HDR really brings out the beautiful textures of the sagebrush in front, but it also brings out that big hole at bottom left, where the eye keeps getting stuck. In a more traditional conversion it might be possible to minimize that hole much better. Not sure about that.
If you want a good resource for HDR, try David Nightingale's book, "Practical HDR" (//www.amazon.com/Practical-HDR-complete-creating-Dynamic/dp/0240812492). David knows HDR - he's one of the best when it comes to using HDR to the advantage of the picture. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/12/2025 09:10:11 PM EST.