| Image |
Comment |
| 06/06/2005 12:08:08 AM |
Thrillby Dax-Comment: Congrats on top 10. Creativity rewarded! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2005 12:07:21 AM |
Thrillby Dax-Comment: Congrats on top 10. Creativity rewarded! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2005 12:05:46 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2005 12:05:10 AM |
mystic river by arngrimurComment: Wonderful! Moody wins! And my version of moody almost made top 20, so there's hope for us all! Congrats! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2005 12:04:17 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2005 02:12:10 AM |
The World In Infrared.by marboComment: This looks less like infrared and more like an old, faded C-6 print. The effect is quite lovely, as an effect, but the image itself suffers from lack of a subject or any sort of compositional dynamic to hold our interest. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2005 02:10:14 AM |
Spring's Bountyby Judith PolakoffComment: Almost completely without anythign to focus on, almost totally subject-less, this image becomes all about the muted sense of light, with even the colors downplayed (the temptation to shif them up in saturation must have been hard to resist). I like it quite a lot, but I suspect it is not faring well at the hands of the voters. From me, a 7. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2005 02:07:57 AM |
Swan Lakeby StagoleeComment: The horizon running downhill to the right and the strange lack of luminosity in what should, by rights, be a hauntingly luminous scene detract from this very well seen and basically very beautiful image. 6 from me. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2005 02:05:18 AM |
Wind Effectsby beamsclanComment: This is quite beautiful and well-seen. I have two nits, basically:
1. There's visible evidence of oversharpening all along the horizon on the left. There are zeveral ways to fix thisin PS, including just using less sharpening; I don't think the image needs to be this sharp, certainly not in the sky/tree area. You could have made a selection of the foreground dune only and just sharpened that area very profitably.
2. The placement of the tree is distinctly arbitrary, it leaves an area to the right that's quite uncomfortable to my eye. I have tried cropping out half of that area, bringing the right edge closer to the tree, and IMO this improved the composition dramatically.
Regardless, it's a strong entry and I hope it does well. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2005 01:59:53 AM |
Beauty in Decayby lytaComment: Conceptually this is exceptionally nice, but there's a harsh garishness to it that isn't working that well for me. Also, the yellowish central portion of the image is out of critical focus, and yet that's the area our eyes are migrating to, so more DOF or focusing in a bit would have helped a lot here. The reddisha rea upper left is a real eyetrap also. This being advanced editing, it would have been easy to desaturate that area so it faded back a bit, and this would have been a plus. Still, a nice, strong image and a good score from me. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/19/2025 05:20:09 PM EST.