Kings Beach night
by dazza17

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club:

First of all I should say that your notes say this is a panorama and you mention exposures (pleural) if that's the case then your image isn't legal under 'advanced editing', though it would be under 'expert editing' and if you had received a validation request you'd be DQ'd. I thought you should know.

Putting that aside and taking the image at face value I find there are some fascinating elements to this image: The foreground surface is complex and interesting, the shadow of the railings creating an impression of a hybrid of the manmade and natural. The play of light on the motion blurred water imbues it with a similar effect we see with light painting - I like that. I like the multiple lights on the horizon too, giving us a sense of the wider world beyond the bay. The settlement to the right helps to give a sense of scale to the image an the bright star bursting bright light helps to draw the eye over there.

Overall a nice image but if I were you, if this is made from stitched exposures I'd keep the image honest and report it to Site Council.

Paul

Man on a pier
by Historicus

Comment:
Greeting from the Critique Club:

I'm very pleased to have this fine image to critique. I voting I rated it highly giving it an 8. The precariousness of the man's position adds a lot of drama to this image, more so because of the point at which you have caught the image - the pole below is probably under the bridge but still suggests the possibility of impalement? The texture in the upper part of the image is wonderful - it communicates the light and offers a substitute for sky very effectively; so effectively in fact that if we really try we can convince ourselves that he walks up with the clouds.

The contrast is excellent - it serves to from the man into a silhouette and there is power in that form

Overall this is a very well made image; I'd have never have believed that you made it in a hurry.

Well done.

Angel Dewi
by lobrin

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club:

Let me start by saying that I am a fan of model shots - I do a few myself; I quite enjoyed the image and gave it a 6 in voting. I can remember looking at it and being able to appreciate the time and trouble you had gone to. Although the overall composition obeys geometric convention, I do think you have relegated your model somewhat, placing the stone cross central to the viewer's eye and brain. Furthermore when our eyes do come to rest on the model, she is further eclipsed by the dress (and wings) because of the huge difference in luminosity. If I crop the image with my hand, losing most of the cross and putting your image into a landscape aspect ratio, with the model large in the frame, the image lifts instantly. She is your subject here, you should treat her as such.

Skills-wise, sure perhaps there is a little bit too much smoothing or noise reduction and her hair is lost into the background, but there is promise in the image - I'd love to have a play about with the RAW to see what alternatives look like - the fact that the image interests me enough to want to do that is a good thing.

Best regards

Paul

"He spake well who said that graves are the footprints of angels" ~Henry Wadsworth Longfe
by supanova

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club:

First of all I need to 'fess up - looking at your histogram above, I was one of your 2s.You've been a victim of my prejudice of all things figurine and statuesque. I'm not alone but I'm probably among the most vehement. Now that I've said that, let me see what else I can offer...

Your aspect ratio and consequent placement of main subject is eclectic, that can work but for me I think that's best done if you can balance the composition with some compelling features in the space so created. You've pulled off elements of that - the succession of graves pulling us into the image with the communication of depth. I think your choice of depth of field works against you, making it difficult to make this very effective though, the 'SIMS' letters are apparent enough to catch our attention yet out of focus enough to frustrate. Tonally, this is quite flat - I don't know what editing tools you have available to you but I think a boost in contrast or the addition of a carefully constructed vignette would have helped to create some drama.

When I look at an image, I like to see a photographic footprint - evidence of the choices the photographer has made and to be able to appreciate the benefits of those choices. Here, the placement of the angel does reflect a clear choice (so I like that) but it hasn't left me with an impression that the choice was effective.

I'm sorry that I don't like it more but hopefully these words offer a bit of a rationale as to why.

Paul

Don't Be Anonymous
by smellyfish1002

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club:

This is a fine, fine image. The blend of sharpness and structure combined with the dynamically blurry elements makes for a most compelling juxtaposition. I'm particularly fond of the guy bottom right and how he draws the eye's attention to the wall and how the wall sends the eye into the far distance to dance across the mezzanine before hurtling back along the line of the information boards.

Your 4/10 exposure time is perfect - I'm surprised; I'd have thought it would need a little longer to get this effect; those folks must be walking with a purpose; perhaps it's 8:03 and they have a ticket for the train departing from track 103.

I'm pleased this did well. A very nicely crafted image.

Choices
by bonnett

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club:

I think this is an exceptional image. Wonderful tones, bags of story and an intriguing compositional balance. I really like your use of negative space here and how your subject stares blankly into it. I also like how the image is black on the left, white on the right and grey in the centre - perhaps a visual clue that some choices aren't black and white and that the considered action may lead to a 'grey' outcome.

The pin sharp eye is especially well judged, providing an anchor point from which the eye can explore the rest of the image.

So much to like here. Good job all round.

glassbaby™
by Art Roflmao

Comment:
Classic!

What We Bought
by spiritualspatula

Comment:
OK - I really should make a comment here. First of all, let me say that I liked this enough to give it an 8.....

I think this is 'over-made'. There's no way I'd have thought this was a live scene. I had it down as novel use of a data projector, that shadow behind the case transecting the torso, letting the background show through created that impression. I read from your notes that you wanted create a disconnect between the figure and the scene - you've achieved that, no question, but I think it has been your undoing, the image ceases to offer a feeling of authenticity. This is a shame because, the scene, the idea, the message and the choices with coloration are all bang on.

Had you chosen to stand in the scene, without the camera rotation, I suspect you'd have had an different reception entirely. Your vision, commitment and talent are unquestionable; but you made a key choice here that has cost you much higher score overall.

Elegant Egret
by BuddyBaum

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club.

I think this image benefits from some fine colour accents; the blue sky, the green and orange around the face too. I think you have the highlights at the right level too, bright but still with plenty of dynamic range.

Sharpness is a slight problem, the feet are perfect but unfortunately they aren't the most interesting part of the image. I'm surprised to see this as a 1/1600s capture, I'd have expected to see 'frozen' wings at that shutter speed, perhaps the unsharpness is all focus related. You've filled the frame admirably for a 105mm bird shot but I think the centre placement isn't the boldest or most interesting.

Overall this is a good shot, it scored well in the context of a Free Study, especially one that came on the back of a bird challenge.

Paul

At the twilight's last gleaming...
by Bear_Music

Comment:
I really like this.