|
|
Showing 3381 - 3390 of ~4217 |
Image |
Comment |
| 12/03/2005 07:00:43 PM | Colorfulby dr rickComment: 7 - Good colors, especially against this background. Criticism; quality dependent, an even tighter crop (especially to lose that leg tag) and 'use' those two vivid/bright blues, may have made this even better in my opinion. Difficult, but also like to be able to discern that beak a bit more which may have happened with a tighter crop, not sure. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:55:13 PM | Masters Handby CalliopeKelComment: 7 - Good character, nice color combinations. Criticism; difficult, perhaps a slightly different 'hand pose', a little sharper on the dog's eye/cheek, may have made this even better in my opinion. Not sure on the frame, 'works' but wonder if a variation (especially of color) may have enhanced certain features/colors in the shot. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:50:09 PM | Calmby dr3amzComment: 8 - Like this, mostly for the shape/pattern of the waves on the shoreline, which obviously this size does not do justice to. Criticism; difficult, like to see those waves accentuated/used/enhanced more, but not sure if even a horizontal framing would do that. No idea how to adjust it, but as straight as the horizon seems, the reflection of the sunset on the water - if that was 'perfectly straight', may have made this even better in my opinion, hard to explain. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:42:07 PM | Journeyby SammieComment: 8 - Really like this, I think it is the simplicity and the gracefulness that appeals most. Criticism; very difficult, especially with likely resulting contrast issues, but would like to see those birds 'pop' more against the sky, 'somehow'. The 'hazy' (and 'light') background still 'works', but again, if somehow to gain more 'pop' in the birds, may have made this even better in my opinion. Excellent capture. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:38:42 PM | Mauriceby jduffettComment: 8 - Good capture. Excellent coloring. Good detail. Criticism; difficult, but perhaps even sharper if possible (obviously camera/lens dependent), especially on that fur, (I like the pose/detail in the arms/fore paws) - like to be able to see more detail in those feet/claws too, but difficult to capture 'it all' in the squirrel. Perhaps a tighter crop (or even a vertical framing, not sure) enabling more 'zoom'/closer (quality dependent), may have also made this even better in my opinion. Like the 'context' of the brown 'twigs' top left, adds another element, which would obviously be lost in a vertical framing so who knows. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:28:57 PM | Sunset Coastby marboComment: 8 - Very nice, beautiful scene and colors. Criticism; like to see the green in the fore a little more 'rich' if possible. Not sure on the crop on the left, but depends what you had to work with, perhaps a little more of the 'shore' there, or else (again depending) a different angle, also of course, depending what is there, on the left of the cliffs. Perhaps a little less of the sky, as it isn't as interesting as the scenery (plus the clouds not being 'level', the 'cropping' on the right is more noticeable, if that makes sense), may have also made this better in my opinion. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 06:24:21 PM | Peaceby AmasonComment: 8 - Beautiful scene. Lovely simple colors. Obviously the size doesn't do this justice, especially in the 'herd', which likely adds a very good element 'wall size'. Criticism; not much, perhaps the 'enclosure'/paddock/yard/whatever in the fore used more by choosing a more identical, but scaled frame (apologies if this is what you have done but hard to discern at this size), may have made this even better. Still, and especially at this size, I think slightly more 'height' (more than 380) may have helped this in this medium, especially to try to see/discern more detail in the church(?) and that 'herd', maybe. Not sure on the frame, works, but again, at this size may be a little 'thick', and I'd rather have had the extra pixels in detail in the previously mentioned subjects/aspects. Perhaps some 'pp softening' or such in the fore water/lake(?), as seems a touch grainy/blotchy (but again might be resizing issues). | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 05:38:00 PM | Freedomby samanwarComment: 8 - Excellent capture, including 'pose' capture. Seemingly very good control of the whites, especially on this light/white background. Really like how the tailfeathers appear almost translucent. Criticism; difficult, a little more detail in the 'fore wings' or even tips, may have made this even better, but likely lose the detail in the face/tail, so who knows. Not sure on the frame, seems a bit 'harsh' (especially the black & thickness) for the delicacy of the main features (feathers) of the bird. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 05:33:45 PM | Epilogueby ZoomdakComment: 8 - Very nice. Nice sunset/cloud capture. Differing silhouette colors nice too. Criticism; possibly a crop variation, especially bottom fore left, 'dark something' there. Like to see 'somehow', a little more detail in the waves. Also, 'somehow', some more separation or definition between the fore/middle/distant rocks/mountains, mainly on the left, may have given this something 'extra'. Perhaps also some softening of the dark areas in the sky, seems a little blotchy but could be the resizing, may have made this even better in my opinion. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/03/2005 05:22:55 PM | Vulture Cultureby MAKComment: 8 - Excellent capture, colors, facial detail/texture and seemingly white/contrast control. Criticism; I want to say 'if only' that beak were sharp too, but likely lose the effect on the face/eye, so who knows. Like the contrasting 'softness' of the feathers around the head, but if just a bit sharper/more detail/texture on that skin around the eye (whether or not retaining the soft feathers or gaining more detail in them, either way still effective), as difficult as that might be (and this size doesn't help), likely make this even better in my opinion. Two small 'white' marks, one on the start of the beak and one just below, on the feathers, if natural 'ok', if not then perhaps cloning out or such. Possibly an even tighter crop on the left, although the context is good as is, may also have made this even better, who knows. Not sure on the frame, especially the color(s) and white 'inner'. | Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
Showing 3381 - 3390 of ~4217 |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/23/2025 03:46:02 PM EDT.
|