DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Browse Settings
Currently viewing:
Registered UserAP

Show comments:

Per page:

Order:

Comments:


Comments Made by AP
Pages:   ... [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] ... [220]
Showing 901 - 910 of ~2200
Image Comment
IMG_1011-copy.jpg
11/20/2008 02:22:36 AM
IMG_1011-copy.jpg
by landon1013

Comment:
Hope I'm not being too brutal but since you asked for comments I'll give it a go.

First, off, the subject matter of the photograph is not extremely interesting. The sunset is great, and the light caught in the clouds might otherwise be a nice subject, but the addition of the house roofs just looks haphazard and sloppy. You see roofs like that in snapshots, not in 'photographs', if you know what I mean. Always think of a photograph as a painting, meaning, if you were 'painting' the scene by hand, would you actively add the tops of the houses and the little bit of the tree? If so, for what reason? The point being, you need to think about every element of the photograph, and if it doesn't add anything to the impact of the photograph, then it detracts from it, and thus you should not include it. Simplicity is usually king.

Next off, the impact of the photograph would be helped by a contrast boost. You may not see it, but there are a whole bunch of muddy grays in the sky, you need to get them out and get clean colors. You can do this in photoshop through the use of Levels, Curves, or by going into Selective Color > Choosing Neutrals > Pumping up the 'black' within the Neutrals.

There also might be a pinkish cast on the whole image, so it might be benefited by setting a 'true black' and a 'true white' point, which are found in the Levels and Curves options. Setting the darkest point of the photograph as 'true black' will augment all the other pixels relative to that pixel, and will render the photo clean and 'cast-free'. Check out the basic tutorials on this website if you don't know what I'm talking about this or the contrast thing.

Finally, whatever noise reduction or art effect you put on the image was too much. The house tops look cartoonish and unreal. Those effects might have a positive impact on the sky, so if you do that you should make sure to only apply the effect to the sky. Do so by adding the effect to a duplicate of your background, and then erasing out the parts of the image that you don't want the effect applied to, so the buildings remain sharp and interesting while the sky gets that ethereal look.

Not trying to be mean here just offering my honest thoughts and suggestions for how you can improve! Good luck with it all, this site is great for learning.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Tia Maria
11/19/2008 02:20:01 AM
Tia Maria
by CWelch

Comment:
Love the texture, light, and look of the dog in this one...
Photographer found comment helpful.
...as Silk
11/19/2008 12:37:26 AM
...as Silk
by LVicari

Comment:
how the f did this get a 5.76??
Photographer found comment helpful.
Admiring US Landmarks
11/19/2008 12:06:45 AM
Admiring US Landmarks
by geinafets

Comment:
nice, classic shot, just enough motion blur
Photographer found comment helpful.
Collision
11/19/2008 12:05:13 AM
Collision2nd Place
by Davenit

Comment:
what a capture! Congrats on the ribbon, this is awesome to look at
Photographer found comment helpful.
I N S P I { R E D }
11/19/2008 12:02:53 AM
I N S P I { R E D }1st Place
by Breeee123

Comment:
holy cow, the coveted 8.0, what a shot, you got everything right. Congrats
Photographer found comment helpful.
suprise shot
11/18/2008 07:12:28 PM
suprise shot
by ScooterMcNutty

Comment:
This is a very nice shot and has a lot going for it, including the lighting, unique angle and the pose. However, the focus is a tad soft, and needs to be tack sharp on portraits (unless it is intentionally out of focus). The eye is the focal point and it is blurry. And I think it is a bit overexposed on the face, even given the "high-key" feel. Finally, I think the photo could be improved with a contrast boost. In remedying the exposure/contrast aspects of this image, you may need to do some form of selective adjustments on the left vs. the right side of the face because of the difference in values on either side. Hope all these comments don't come off as too negative, I just really like the shot and thought I would offer some criticism
Photographer found comment helpful.
Me Myself and I
11/18/2008 07:03:22 PM
Me Myself and I
by ScooterMcNutty

Comment:
the shallow DoF and tight focus make for a nice impact on this photo, the subtle catching of light on the eyes is a also a great touch. Self-portraits however will not score well in free-studies, especially ones with the camera visible, but that doesn't take away from the niceness and rawness of this photo
Photographer found comment helpful.
 s c r a p e r i z a t i o n
11/18/2008 06:57:28 PM
s c r a p e r i z a t i o n
by hotpasta

Comment:
You have a most awesome grip on editing. Here it seems like you didn't do too much but that's why its great - knowing the limits. I've found that for myself stopping before that boundary is difficult, excellent stuff
Photographer found comment helpful.
Cameron Bridge
11/18/2008 06:53:31 PM
Cameron Bridge
by BAMartin

Comment:
I like the abstractness of this and the shapes, I think it would benefit from some more contrast and shame the back towers seem a bit soft
Photographer found comment helpful.
Pages:   ... [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] ... [220]
Showing 901 - 910 of ~2200


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/26/2025 11:33:45 PM EDT.