This is fantastic. And I think that, having seen DrJones' portfolio, accusations that he didn't do this are absurd and insulting. If you've seen this elsewhere, it's probably because he got it published.
I wouldn't call it a porn effect at all. The photo is great the way it is. If this bothers you, why look in the nude galleries, what were you expecting to see ?
Originally posted by goodganesh:
why was the dress see-thru? would prefer such a nice pic without that porn effect
would this shot be any less erotic without the nippleage? probably not, but its perfect the way it is. great shot dr.
oh yeah, isn't it a rule of photography that "eyes attract eyes" well guess what- something else attracts eyes too.
Thanks Theo. Keep up with the practice. You'll get there!
goodganesh: I find that people often use the word "porn" to describe erotic images that offend them. It doesn't mean anything, at least not to me. Too bad you didn't like the pic.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
