This is another example of how a shot got hammered by the speed vote, move on, crowd...
Lutchenko, BenDonover: you 'got' it as well as I :)
Yo_spiff almost got it, but his barber got in the way ;)
I don't see an evidence of camera movement. Either you missed the idea entirely, or it meets the topic in some subtle way that didn't even rustle my hair on the way overhead.
This is a complete toss-up for me. At first glance it merely looked like a high speed shot, but in retrospect you may have been panning and caught the swallow perfectly without any blur whatsoever. The solid white background of course prevents proving this explanation. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and score an 8 for a risky entry and OOB thinking and a good photo to boot (despite the zoomed out cropping, small subject). (SaraR ???)
there doesn't appear to be much camera movement at all. And I cant help but be bothered when it becomes obvious who took the picture because they do the same exact thing over and over again.
quite a risky shot for this challenge. I guess you're going to say that you were tracking the bird and hence you have camera movement but the question is, did you create and interesting affect with your camera movement?
IMO I don't think you did.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
