...5.2...not that I ever expect anything higher. It is a really good B&W conversion though. No comments...people are confused by the absence of that "point of focus" I bet. So I guess one should not take pictures in a dense forest? Or maybe I should have extended the exposure and made the water fluffy. This photograph is too taxing for many. I love it. It was a beautiful spot.
[Apr. 29th, 2009 10:14:06 AM]
..oh...and not that I'm a stickler for challenge themes...but it did say trees, not tree...so here are lots of trees.
[Apr. 29th, 2009 12:03:09 PM]
Very good b&w capture. well composed and interesting.
Thank you scruff!
[May. 5th, 2009 11:29:42 PM]
Thanks everyone for taking time to comment. I've really enjoyed them. Glad to know some appreciated the photograph.
Statistics
Place: 91 out of 263 Avg (all users): 5.5266 Avg (commenters): 7.6667 Avg (participants): 5.3699 Avg (non-participants): 5.6119 Views since voting: 799 Views during voting: 288 Votes: 207 Comments: 7 Favorites: 1 (view)
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
Photographer found comment helpful.
