| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 03/16/2009 02:09:44 AM | 
		| | For the people who have doubts about the age of this tree: the location is at nearly 6000 feet, so one would expect a slow growth and it made an old impression on me. How it is possible to guess the trunk diameter without a reference is beyond me, it was certainly more than 14 inches! | 
 | 
| Comments Made During the Challenge  | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 11:43:57 PM | 
		|  | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 07:00:12 PM | 
		| | Great use of the snow to show off all those twisting branches. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/14/2009 12:40:46 AM | 
		|  | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/12/2009 10:01:22 PM | 
		| | Interesting tree.  The darkness in the corners distracts me a bit | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/10/2009 08:40:52 PM | 
		| | This is just my opinion, any tree over 100 years needs to be at least 14 inches thick. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/09/2009 09:47:16 PM | 
		| | Nice tree just too closely cropped for me.  I really good picture though. | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/09/2009 11:55:52 AM | 
		| | I really like this image and I've scored it well.  If growing at a fairly high altitude, it could be about 100 years old.  8 | 
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			|  | 03/09/2009 11:30:44 AM | 
		|  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 05:16:43 AM EDT.