Originally posted by Kaveran: Interesting how you think a little more underexposure would do the trick while others say the image is allready underexposed... |
The point is that a silhouette does not show any detail, it should only show the shape, the outline.
What you have here is a photo that is too dark (i.e. underexposed) for a "normal" subject, yet has too much detail to be called a silhouette.
If you were to underexpose this even further, you would then actually HAVE a silhouette, and a pretty interesting one at that! |