DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
Small Arms Fire
Small Arms Fire
NovaTiger


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Fire II (Advanced Editing IV)
Camera: Canon EOS-20D
Lens: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II
Location: Gearhart, OR
Date: Aug 10, 2006
Aperture: 32
ISO: 100
Shutter: .25"
Galleries: Humorous, Military
Date Uploaded: Aug 11, 2006

Cropped, Saturation, USM, Neat Image, Saved for Web.

My brother and I, having tried a completely different idea for the challenge and failed, started goofing around with WD-40, matches, and army men. This is the result.

Nothing political is intended. I make shallow, "pretty" or "pretty cool" art and not the kind that tries to invoke the philosopher in you. I expect I will receive mostly shallow "oh cute" remarks in return.

Statistics
Place: 135 out of 160
Avg (all users): 4.5960
Avg (commenters): 5.5000
Avg (participants): 4.4390
Avg (non-participants): 4.7069
Views since voting: 1015
Views during voting: 285
Votes: 198
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1 (view)


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
08/24/2006 01:48:56 PM
Hello from the Critique Club.

I didn't vote on this challenge so this is the first time I've looked at your image critically. I think your score is result of a combination of two things, your subject choice and a couple of technical issues. One commenter mentioned that toys don't do well in DPC challenges. I'm not experienced enough in the DPC ways to confirm that but a toy soldier as the main subject when fire is the assigned subject is not the way to garner high scores. Compositionally, you did a nice job of setting this shot up. The soldier is located in a good location and all of the pieces fit together well. On a technical level there are things that could be improved. You made the right choice on using fill flash to help bring out the details in the soldier. Unfortunately, the soldier doesn't have a lot of detail to begin with and the fill flash was just a bit strong, causing harsh reflections and strong shadows. If you could have used a couple of light sources from the side, preferably as reflected light, the soldier might have come off looking a bit more 3 dimensional. I hope you find something within this critique helpful and feel free to PM me if you have any questions.

Tim
 Comments Made During the Challenge
08/20/2006 01:33:54 PM
clever.
08/17/2006 11:10:21 PM
hardy har har
08/17/2006 06:47:21 PM
Not as good as some of the other "army men" shots I've seen - I think the poor lighting on the soldier is the main problem
  Photographer found comment helpful.
08/16/2006 12:55:41 PM
Reminds me of the scene in War of the Worlds where they're on the hill fighting...

The only thing I can see that I do not like is the long shadow from the figure - other than that I think this is a great shot.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
08/15/2006 07:50:42 AM
lol. cute idea theres soem distracting sensor dust in the fire though.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
08/14/2006 10:37:45 PM
The light looks far too unnatural for the setting, and the glare off Joe is distracting.
  Photographer found comment helpful.
08/14/2006 07:17:49 PM
gave me a good chuckel
08/14/2006 02:31:00 PM
It's a good idea but toys just don't do well at DPC for some reason. I think for this shot to have been more effective the fire should have been in the foreground and the light is not bright/directed to make my eye see what the focus of the shot is. As all I see now is just poorly lit plastic army man who is OOF. You meet the challenge with the fire so 5.

Wazz
  Photographer found comment helpful.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/08/2025 02:19:02 AM EDT.