Author Thread
01/05/2005 12:44:05 AMPost actions
Thanks for your votes and comments. I guess this didn't fly very well with the voters probably because it wasn't obviously mechanical. The title is in reference to the 1000m water resistance, and I think was not the best choice. :-)
Comments Made During the Challenge
01/03/2005 09:04:30 PMPost actions
Great capture with cool lighting. A great commercial shot. Bumping up.
Photographer found comment helpful.
01/03/2005 01:59:57 PMPost actions
Would have probably preferred a shot of the inside mechanisms but this is a nice shot anyway, no reflection to really speak up and nice detail.
Photographer found comment helpful.
01/02/2005 07:33:07 PMPost actions
nice detail, lighting and shadow.
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/31/2004 08:39:39 PMPost actions
Very nicely done. It looks like it could be in a magazine ad for the watch. Great lighting and background.
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/31/2004 11:25:09 AMPost actions
What powers this watch????
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/30/2004 01:24:58 PMPost actions
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/30/2004 01:05:06 AMPost actions
This is a very well taken product shot. Looks like an advertisement. It doesn't wow me, but it is well done. 7.
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/29/2004 07:01:56 PMPost actions
hm, is this a wind-up watch?
nice lighting. photography of watches/jewelry/other small metallic objects is notoriously difficult.
Photographer found comment helpful.
12/29/2004 04:59:48 AMPost actions
Nice title. You admit that you chose a common theme, however your watch picture doesn't show any mechanics of the watch! Thus, it doesn't really meet the challenge. 4.
Photographer found comment helpful.