| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/09/2025 03:25:34 PM |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by Paul:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not crazy of the processing. Sorry. |
I think there’s less processing than one might think. Muted the colours a bit and cloned out some linear artefacts introduced by the long exposure software, and a bit of added structure. |
Hmm. Interesting. Well, my apologies then. It appeared to me, and kinda still does, that an art filter of some type was applied (not that I'm totally opposed to them as I've used them a couple times myself). Just seemed like a muddy image without much definition, and that seems to have been intentional.
Art is a finicky thing I guess. :-) |
Here’s the original:
 |
|
|
|
07/09/2025 01:11:15 AM |
Originally posted by Paul:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not crazy of the processing. Sorry. |
I think there’s less processing than one might think. Muted the colours a bit and cloned out some linear artefacts introduced by the long exposure software, and a bit of added structure. |
Hmm. Interesting. Well, my apologies then. It appeared to me, and kinda still does, that an art filter of some type was applied (not that I'm totally opposed to them as I've used them a couple times myself). Just seemed like a muddy image without much definition, and that seems to have been intentional.
Art is a finicky thing I guess. :-) |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/08/2025 10:26:20 AM |
Originally posted by Paul:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not crazy of the processing. Sorry. |
I think there’s less processing than one might think. Muted the colours a bit and cloned out some linear artefacts introduced by the long exposure software, and a bit of added structure. |
That's what I thought. Gave it an 8. Beautiful. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/08/2025 09:33:29 AM |
| Very beautiful, stunning use of editing. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/08/2025 04:35:41 AM |
Superb Paul, and to me this looked like it was all in camera, I think the edit was just perfect not overdone one bit.
Message edited by author 2025-07-08 05:08:56. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/08/2025 02:27:53 AM |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Not crazy of the processing. Sorry. |
I think there’s less processing than one might think. Muted the colours a bit and cloned out some linear artefacts introduced by the long exposure software, and a bit of added structure. |
|
|
|
07/08/2025 12:36:03 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Comments Made During the Challenge  |
|
|
07/07/2025 05:39:21 PM |
| Not crazy of the processing. Sorry. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/07/2025 10:00:45 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/06/2025 01:51:49 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/04/2025 02:24:26 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
07/03/2025 12:03:07 PM |
| Beautiful blur and glow. I'm not in love with the title. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/18/2025 02:34:19 AM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
