DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Challenge Entries
Portfolio Images
This image is not part of a public portfolio.
~Mirage~
~Mirage~
tmilob


Photograph Information Photographer's Comments
Challenge: Broken (Advanced Editing II)
Camera: Kodak DX6440
Location: Indiana
Date: Dec 11, 2004
Aperture: 14.00
ISO: 140
Shutter: 1/90 sec
Galleries: Still Life, Studio
Date Uploaded: Dec 11, 2004

Laid out lead letters, situated wire sculptured flies around broken "R" letter. Fixed overhead incandesant bulb, Shot macro setting, with fill flash. enhanced color, contrast and cropped in Paint Shop.

Statistics
Place: 158 out of 177
Avg (all users): 4.6094
Avg (commenters): 4.7500
Avg (participants): 4.5269
Avg (non-participants): 4.6869
Views since voting: 863
Views during voting: 331
Votes: 192
Comments: 9
Favorites: 0


Please log in or register to add your comments!

AuthorThread
12/26/2004 10:58:36 AM
Greetings from the Critique Club...

Definately fits the challenge, so that's good heh. Seems the lighting is a bit harsh on the lower part of the photo and almost in need of some more in the upper part.

The focus seems a bit soft throughout, but it's not that bad. As far as composition goes, it's obviously well thought-out, but as far as for viewing, my eyes seem to jump around quite a bit never really coming to rest on a main subject of interest.

I, too, ask myself why the flies? I don't really feel they add anything extra to the image, just seem to busy it up some. I've noticed that when shooting close up shots like this, the image will come out a lot 'cleaner' if you use a paper that is more shiny than coarse. The shadows will fall smoother and there will be soft reflections whereas in this shot, everything seems a bit coarse.

-- Fix the lighting, and use a 'smoother' paper, and I bet your score would increase quite a bit. Overall, it's a good idea, keep shooting!

Message edited by author 2004-12-26 10:59:26.
 Comments Made During the Challenge
12/19/2004 09:31:35 PM
Returning for comments:
Very clever! Bumping up.
12/19/2004 02:08:40 AM
interesting interpretation, but not sure what relevance the flys serve. if you could somehow have managed to get only the R in focus (and eliminated the flys and gradient to brown from top to bottom), this could be great!
12/15/2004 10:18:37 PM
Unusual.
12/14/2004 04:44:32 PM
I like this one. There is a feeling of surrealism to it and reading the word "broken" from the bottom up only adds to it. I only wish there was something in the upper corners to make it more balanced. If you don't have any melting clocks handy, then perhaphs a goldfish to the left and a cabbage to the right?
  Photographer found comment helpful.
12/14/2004 06:55:11 AM
unhelpful comments removed

Message edited by author 2005-10-05 06:34:54.
12/14/2004 04:56:58 AM
Composition: 6, Technical: 6, Appeal: 5, Challenge: 3, Overall Score: 4 (weighted)
  Photographer found comment helpful.
12/13/2004 12:21:44 PM
I think this shot needed more lighting and sharper focus. Great idea!
  Photographer found comment helpful.
12/13/2004 01:37:43 AM
I am confused as to the meaning. Why the flies? The image is so-so.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 03:00:59 AM EDT.