| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/15/2004 10:15:07 AM			 | 
		
		| Would look much better with a duck in it. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
 Comments Made During the Challenge   | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/31/2004 10:33:52 PM			 | 
		
		| I think the composition here is pretty good, however I would have given it a higher rating if there were less motion blur (perhaps a tripod would help here, though I know that isn't always convenient and you already probably know that).  But besides the shake, a good photo. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/31/2004 06:26:56 PM			 | 
		
		| A bit fuzzy, shakey camera probally. Next time prop it against the wall on the right to help steady it. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/30/2004 12:10:38 PM			 | 
		
		 | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/29/2004 04:18:07 PM			 | 
		
		 | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/29/2004 02:53:43 PM			 | 
		
		| A lot of both implied and actual lines here, and I like the composition, but the over-exposure and camera shake (motion blur/focus), really take away from the strengths for me.  I suppose it's hard to get no camera shake with an obviously long exposure (although I think you could have probably dropped the exposure significantly), while a train is rumbling by. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/28/2004 05:55:09 PM			 | 
		
		| I've a whole load of six's to comment on and couldn't wait to get to this one, I like it a lot, but, it could have been a 7, 8 or even a 9 for me.  Its obviously a long exposure to get the movement of the train and the people.  But do the sign and the seated people have a double image?  If it intentional, it doesn't work for me.  If its camera shake then you should have used something to steady the camera.  Having those sharp would have made a much much better image in my opinion.  I have given it a six and I still like it. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/28/2004 12:27:21 PM			 | 
		
		| Nice photo, but a little motion blur! |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/27/2004 03:20:26 PM			 | 
		
		| nice motion - the double image in the stationery objects is distracting |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/26/2004 07:35:31 PM			 | 
		
		| Original take on the challenge. Good job. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/26/2004 04:24:09 AM			 | 
		
		| Idea surely is good but i would turned more to train and take less of wall. Or at least croped the sign out otherwise its quite distracting. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/25/2004 12:33:41 PM			 | 
		
		| I can't tell if the blurring on the right side was intentional or not. Distracting for me. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/25/2004 12:31:26 AM			 | 
		
		| Very nice shot. Good job (10) |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
10/25/2004 12:08:42 AM			 | 
		
		| Cool picture. Somebody's in London. :) I wanna go there again. I only wish there wasn't camera shake (the ground/wall/other static objects are blurred a bit because of it). The train is a nice blur though. |  
  | 
   Photographer found comment helpful. | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 06:44:57 AM EST.