DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> .40
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 18 of 18, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/07/2006 07:46:42 PM · #1
opinions?


11/07/2006 07:48:52 PM · #2
Well the signature is really eye catching.
11/07/2006 08:04:27 PM · #3
The white scratch (or smudge) on the top edge of the barrel (the left side as you face it) is a bit distracting. Otherwise, I like the bokeh and the lighting.
11/07/2006 08:07:32 PM · #4
signature is the best part.. otherwise rather uninteresting..sorry
11/07/2006 08:11:00 PM · #5
What's the purpose or intended use of the photo? It could be wonderfully fit for a specific intended purpose ... but without knowing it, it's hard to like it on its own and with out context.
11/07/2006 08:51:23 PM · #6
So the technical aspects of the photo have no merit without an intended use?
How about FOR gun control...For the NRA. Would make a good stock shot for either and many other things.
As said before...good bokeh, focus, and lighting. A few minor little blemishes to clean up, but good.

You could name it HARMLESS, paperweight, or doorstop. that could get ya a bunch of nice reactions. :)
11/07/2006 09:23:53 PM · #7
Title it "Eighteen Thousand Students Are Hospitalized Each Year Because Of School Bus Accidents"
11/07/2006 09:45:15 PM · #8
Originally posted by David Ey:

Title it "Eighteen Thousand Students Are Hospitalized Each Year Because Of School Bus Accidents"


It's actually only 17,999 students. That last one dropped out of school earlier in the day. *grin*
11/10/2006 03:43:20 PM · #9
thanks for the comments. it appears the better the title the better the remarks. I'm just not that good at witty titles.
11/10/2006 03:50:59 PM · #10
Originally posted by dacrazyrn:

So the technical aspects of the photo have no merit without an intended use?


Yes, exactly right. (just felt like beating a dead horse today)
11/10/2006 03:56:20 PM · #11
some things that come to my mind:

- use USM to get the sharpness more out of it
- is this a real gun? looks plastic to me
- bump up the contrast a bit
- you should get rid of the signature. it distracts very, because it's the only color in the photo, and red. red is the color our eyes go to immediately
- DoF looks nice
- rest is said ;)

oh and about the title. you said:

"it appears the better the title the better the remarks."

i don't think that's true :)
11/10/2006 04:12:58 PM · #12
Moved to Individual Photo Discussion area, where it belongs.
11/10/2006 04:32:26 PM · #13
Originally posted by biteme:

some things that come to my mind:

- use USM to get the sharpness more out of it
- is this a real gun? looks plastic to me
- bump up the contrast a bit
- you should get rid of the signature. it distracts very, because it's the only color in the photo, and red. red is the color our eyes go to immediately
- DoF looks nice
- rest is said ;)

oh and about the title. you said:

"it appears the better the title the better the remarks."

i don't think that's true :)


Thanks! Yes, it's real. Smith&Wesson Sigma .40
11/10/2006 04:34:29 PM · #14
Originally posted by rpwsrw:

Thanks! Yes, it's real. Smith&Wesson Sigma .40


very welcome!

oh, it is real. hmm. I think I'm just used to shiny metallic guns from the movies ;-)
11/10/2006 04:37:07 PM · #15
Originally posted by biteme:

Originally posted by rpwsrw:

Thanks! Yes, it's real. Smith&Wesson Sigma .40


very welcome!

oh, it is real. hmm. I think I'm just used to shiny metallic guns from the movies ;-)


To be fair the grip frame on the sigma is plastic (Polymer).

:-)
11/10/2006 04:38:07 PM · #16
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:

Originally posted by biteme:

Originally posted by rpwsrw:

Thanks! Yes, it's real. Smith&Wesson Sigma .40


very welcome!

oh, it is real. hmm. I think I'm just used to shiny metallic guns from the movies ;-)


To be fair the grip frame on the sigma is plastic (Polymer).

:-)


aaaah look! :D
11/10/2006 04:39:11 PM · #17
oh by the way rpwsrw (sheesh, that's a name to break your tongue at ;-)), if you have an update, could you show it here?
11/10/2006 05:48:29 PM · #18
Originally posted by biteme:

oh by the way rpwsrw (sheesh, that's a name to break your tongue at ;-)), if you have an update, could you show it here?


sure.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/28/2024 10:16:41 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/28/2024 10:16:41 AM EDT.