Author | Thread |
|
02/04/2014 11:35:32 AM · #23576 |
|
|
02/04/2014 12:27:09 PM · #23577 |
Originally posted by bvy: Originally posted by beatabg: Originally posted by bvy: I'll post the final proof tomorrow. |
That's some real suspense. I can tell everyone is waiting. I know I am. |
Finally, some enthusiasm. Okay, here we go:
For k >= 0, let P_k denote the family of all k-degenerate graphs, and for some graph G, let X_(P_k)(G) represent the minimum number of partitions of the vertices of V(G) necessary for each partition to induce a k-degenerate subgraph of G. A graph G is said to be l-critical with respect to X_(P_k) if X_(P_k)(G) = l but X_(P_k)(G - v) = l - 1 for every v in G.
If G is l-critical with respect to X_(P_k), then d(G) >= (k + 1)(l - 1).
Proof: Let u be a vertex of least degree in G. Since G is l-critical with respect to X_(P_k), we can partition the vertices of G as follows: Place u in a partition by itself, and partition the remaining vertices of G into (necessarily) l - 1 subsets. Each of these l partitions induces a k-degenerate subgraph, including the single vertex u which is k-degenerate for all k >= 0. Observe that u must be incident with some vertex in each of the l - 1 partitions, for otherwise it could be included in any other partition as a disconnected vertex, and the induced subgraph would still be k-degenerate. Hence, deg(u) >= (l - 1). Expanding on that, u must be incident with at least k + 1 vertices in any partition such that it requires a partition all its own, and deg(u) >= (k + 1)(l - 1). Hence, d(G) >= (k + 1)(l - 1).
This concludes my exploration of the properties of k-degenerate graphs. Thank you all for your support. I next plan to share some fundamental results about edge colorings. At this point, I'm studying Vizing's Theorem and working through an interesting proof that uses induction. (I don't plan to restate it here as it's rather long, though not terribly complicated.) More to come... |
Spork says you should show that with a zero-knowledge proof.
Spork wins |
|
|
02/04/2014 01:52:16 PM · #23578 |
Hey guess what.
I WIN!!!!!!
|
|
|
02/04/2014 03:39:38 PM · #23579 |
|
|
02/04/2014 03:59:43 PM · #23580 |
fast readers win.
f'rinstance, bvy's proof, if speed read, says fork u, u degenerates: Viszla's think better than you and besides are savvy about guinea pig (degu) colourings. like bon appetit, smart chops.
ha. qed. |
|
|
02/04/2014 04:00:49 PM · #23581 |
1+2+3+4+...to inifity = -1/12.
(Thanks Krulwich Wonders)
Do I have to post the full proof or do I win?
Message edited by author 2014-02-04 16:01:14. |
|
|
02/04/2014 04:52:35 PM · #23582 |
Only zero knowledge proofs allowed, but you can't win either way.
Spork wins...the rest of you are here to celebrate and pay him tribute. |
|
|
02/04/2014 05:15:17 PM · #23583 |
|
|
02/04/2014 05:54:16 PM · #23584 |
That's good just be quiet and sit in the corner while I win
|
|
|
02/04/2014 06:10:26 PM · #23585 |
Being quiet isn't my forté. Winning is. |
|
|
02/04/2014 06:43:15 PM · #23586 |
|
|
02/04/2014 06:48:46 PM · #23587 |
But for the occasional temporary interruption, I am always winning. |
|
|
02/04/2014 10:38:05 PM · #23588 |
except when you're not, which is all of the time.
Spork wins. |
|
|
02/04/2014 10:40:18 PM · #23589 |
what? no forté jokes? and you call yourselves immature? |
|
|
02/05/2014 12:28:50 AM · #23590 |
|
|
02/05/2014 02:03:00 AM · #23591 |
I know you are, but what am I? Winning. That's what. Nyeah. |
|
|
02/05/2014 07:46:17 AM · #23592 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: |
I almost want a print. Almost. |
|
|
02/05/2014 10:30:00 AM · #23593 |
Originally posted by the99: nobody is immature here |
Speak for yourself, ya old forte. |
|
|
02/05/2014 10:37:28 AM · #23594 |
Im the king of the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
02/05/2014 11:10:47 AM · #23595 |
You may float like a butterfly, but you sting like a cottonball.
Spork wins |
|
|
02/05/2014 11:50:56 AM · #23596 |
|
|
02/05/2014 12:47:37 PM · #23597 |
Cowboys don't eat cake...
Spork wins. |
|
|
02/05/2014 05:01:48 PM · #23598 |
I love cookies......hhhhhmmmmmm
|
|
|
02/05/2014 09:13:34 PM · #23599 |
|
|
02/06/2014 01:30:52 AM · #23600 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: |
me like not have to chew first, more direct route to tummy! nom nom nom... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/09/2025 10:42:03 AM EDT.