Author | Thread |
|
12/17/2009 01:21:51 AM · #1 |
Just stumbled upon this great collection of surrealist art and thought this would be a great topic for an expert editing challenge, especially given the last Surrealism challenge was basic editing and almost 5 years ago. |
|
|
12/17/2009 02:29:11 AM · #2 |
The idea works for me :- )
The problem is just how complex (or maybe open) the rule set would have to be . . I would suggest it needs to allow it would need to allow multiple images to be taken and blended as a minimum.
But otherwise - sounds cool. |
|
|
12/17/2009 05:49:59 PM · #3 |
|
|
12/17/2009 06:01:06 PM · #4 |
Too weird, Alicia just did a portrait like the other eyeball one
|
|
|
12/17/2009 06:11:31 PM · #5 |
|
|
12/17/2009 06:17:27 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by JulietNN: Too weird, Alicia just did a portrait like the other eyeball one
|
Not wierd at all - in fact it was Alicias cat that set me off in that direction.
She led the way and I simply followed :- ) |
|
|
12/17/2009 06:19:24 PM · #7 |
|
|
12/17/2009 06:51:31 PM · #8 |
Great idea for a challenge. I love a lot of surrealist art, Max Ernst being a particular favourite. I'm also very keen for an Expert Editing challenge. I think there has only been one since i joined nearly a year ago. |
|
|
12/17/2009 07:11:33 PM · #9 |
I like this idea but I think that only it work under the expert editing rules. using only the advanced rules the creativity could be limited
|
|
|
12/17/2009 07:15:16 PM · #10 |
Yeah, it would be pretty hard to find an eyeball that size |
|
|
12/17/2009 07:18:10 PM · #11 |
I made this two days ago. |
|
|
12/17/2009 09:12:10 PM · #12 |
I suck at expert editing.
|
|
|
12/17/2009 09:29:51 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by Rino63: I like this idea but I think that only it work under the expert editing rules. using only the advanced rules the creativity could be limited |
The last Surrealism challenge ran under Basic, and demonstrated a ton of creativity. |
|
|
12/17/2009 09:32:46 PM · #14 |
I like the idea, I would prefer more than basic editing though. Although I could probably get by ok with advanced, I think expert would be fun to mess around with. |
|
|
12/18/2009 12:52:19 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by Rino63: I like this idea but I think that only it work under the expert editing rules. using only the advanced rules the creativity could be limited |
The last Surrealism challenge ran under Basic, and demonstrated a ton of creativity. |
Biased Much!? Considering you WON the last Surrealism challenge ;) |
|
|
12/18/2009 12:59:12 AM · #16 |
|
|
12/18/2009 01:10:55 AM · #17 |
If this gets selected I would love to see you try to pull off something of this magnitude. Under basic editing of course.
Message edited by author 2009-12-18 01:11:35.
|
|
|
12/18/2009 01:14:23 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by yanko:
If this gets selected I would love to see you try to pull off something of this magnitude. Under basic editing of course. |
It might take a few shots of Tequila but I'm game... |
|
|
12/18/2009 04:56:02 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by yanko:
If this gets selected I would love to see you try to pull off something of this magnitude. Under basic editing of course. |
Whoo - what sort of cheese does he eat at bedtime ?? |
|
|
12/18/2009 06:01:55 PM · #20 |
|
|
12/21/2009 03:34:32 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by soup: the good kind... |
the very good kind . . in fact it's just possible he might smoke it as well . . |
|
|
12/21/2009 04:15:53 AM · #22 |
Great challenge suggestion, I love surrealism. I think it should be under basic or advanced as that keeps it more about the shot you take rather than the processing afterwards. Be lots of fun trying to set shots up too :D hehe |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/30/2025 10:40:31 AM EDT.