| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/25/2009 08:38:46 PM · #1 |
Anyone know if we can use it?
I can't find it anywhere and I don't have the time to search all night for it. |
|
|
|
10/25/2009 09:00:42 PM · #2 |
| Come on someone has to know this... |
|
|
|
10/25/2009 10:26:30 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
10/26/2009 12:29:29 AM · #4 |
Disappointed I couldn't get an answer to this question before the rollover.
Oh well, I was going to send the person who answered the question a 3.2 Million dollar bonus. |
|
|
|
10/26/2009 02:28:39 AM · #5 |
Never saw it before sorry. Was watching sports.
There's no limit on what *program* you can use; just on what you *do* with it. There are some effects possible with Portrait Professional, regarding "reshaping" people, that might bring you afoul of the rules, certainly.
R. |
|
|
|
10/26/2009 06:02:44 AM · #6 |
I didnt see this one either - however - be aware that the newest version of portrait professional actually uses a bump-map effect (texture) when smoothing the skin so that it doesn`t have that `china doll` appearance and still retains pores and texture - this is an added texture so possibly would fall foul of the ruleset - the same goes for catchlights in the eyes - it adds these in under certain pre-sets - so again this would probably be against the rules.
And obviously the face shaping is a definite no-no.
If you dig around inside the portrait professional folder you can find these .BMPs in there. |
|
|
|
10/26/2009 08:07:03 AM · #7 |
| Thanks guys, I'll look into it and see what I can find out. |
|
|
|
10/26/2009 10:06:14 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Simms:
I didnt see this one either - however - be aware that the newest version of portrait professional actually uses a bump-map effect (texture) when smoothing the skin so that it doesn`t have that `china doll` appearance and still retains pores and texture - this is an added texture so possibly would fall foul of the ruleset - the same goes for catchlights in the eyes - it adds these in under certain pre-sets - so again this would probably be against the rules. |
We have ample precedent for validating added texture in images as long as it is not a dominant texture. Howevere, it's certainly true that adding catchlights is likely to be a serious no-no.
Originally posted by Simms:
And obviously the face shaping is a definite no-no. |
I *seem* to recall a discussion of this some time ago, pertaining to use of the "liquify" filter, and SC stating that a small amount of body shaping is actually legal... Can't find the reference though.
R. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/25/2025 02:30:24 PM EDT.
