Author | Thread |
|
05/09/2004 02:26:41 PM · #1 |
Can some one guide me ho to convert color snap into B/W.
|
|
|
05/09/2004 02:34:03 PM · #2 |
What software do you have? |
|
|
05/09/2004 02:42:04 PM · #3 |
Well sorry for that, I have PS 7
|
|
|
05/09/2004 02:53:51 PM · #4 |
|
|
05/09/2004 02:54:51 PM · #5 |
The best way I have found is to apply an adjustment layer and select channel mixer. Theres a mono checkbox on the dialog box. However you can then 'play' with the red, green and blue channels until you get the tonal range perfect.
I usually then refine this a little with another layer to adjust the contrast and brightness.
On occasion it is also worth playing around with the hue/saturation too just to really get an perfectly toned monochrome image.
Hope that helps.
Falc
Message edited by author 2004-05-09 14:55:42. |
|
|
05/09/2004 03:02:38 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Falc: The best way I have found is to apply an adjustment layer and select channel mixer. Theres a mono checkbox on the dialog box. However you can then 'play' with the red, green and blue channels until you get the tonal range perfect.
I usually then refine this a little with another layer to adjust the contrast and brightness.
On occasion it is also worth playing around with the hue/saturation too just to really get an perfectly toned monochrome image.
Hope that helps.
Falc |
thanks but i have seen when i use your way i.e channel mixer, face is so white, some how i dont like that white.
BTW I read some where different types of B/W, like panchromatic, ochromatic ,monochromtic,
So if i want to have results as film B/W what the best way
|
|
|
05/09/2004 03:13:53 PM · #7 |
Check out this site and download the settings, you'll love them.
//www.outdooreyes.com/photo51.php3
link
Frank
Message edited by author 2004-05-09 15:14:56. |
|
|
05/09/2004 03:20:02 PM · #8 |
Greyscale Mode - Image> Mode > Greyscale
Desaturation - Image > Adjustment > Desaturation
Channel Mixer - Image > Adjustments > Channel Mixer
Color Channel Selection - Select Channels on the Layers/Channels/Paths palette, and click on Red, Green and Blue Channels. Create a new greyscale documena, and copy.
Ways of making it better after 1 of the above methods:
Contrast/Brightness
Variations
Curves
Levels
Selective Colors
Dodge and Burn
Gradient
Message edited by author 2004-05-09 15:20:48. |
|
|
05/09/2004 07:01:07 PM · #9 |
Here's a great tutorial on "Better B&Ws" using the Channel Mixer:
//www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/b-w_better.shtml
Message edited by author 2004-05-09 19:01:35. |
|
|
05/09/2004 07:59:00 PM · #10 |
Thanks, that helps a lot because I have noticed that when I 'desaturate', I have a tendancy to get a really flat looking tone. This really helps.
|
|
|
05/09/2004 08:21:05 PM · #11 |
No problem... Also, I'm playing with the Action that Caba posted which is pretty cool to. It does a lot of steps which I'm wondering if they are all really needed, although the maker of the action is pretty good and there's probably a good reason for all the steps.
However if you don't want to do all of that... when using the Channel Mixer technique in the article, you'll notice there are 3 basic "choices" which is Red (100% red, 0%blue, 0% green), Green (100% green, 0% blue, 0% red), and Blue (100% blue...). However you can play with the percent levels to duplicate (pretty closely) the results from that the BW action achives, and also to fit your particular picture, since the colors in your shot will make a diff as to which is best. I think the main thing to remember is that your combination of percents should always add up to 100 in general. Example 60%Red, 40%Green, and 0%Blue. Or 50%Red, 40%Green, 10%Blue. And I don't think you want to go negative on the percents, although I'm not sure. I'm still playing around with it. :) |
|
|
05/09/2004 08:33:48 PM · #12 |
Here's the link I use to guide me through the conversion from colour to B&W
//www.digidaan.nl/indexframedigidaan.html?channelmixer/index.html
|
|
|
05/09/2004 10:07:24 PM · #13 |
I just tried this method. He says on the page that this is the reason that his method is better then using the Channel Mixer:
"The secret of a good conversion is having full control over how RGB-values get converted into grayscale-luminosities. The conversion I am about to describe gives that control, much more than the ChannelMixer."
However it seems I have a LOT more control using the channel mixer, and wouldn't using the channel mixer give you "full control over how RGB-values get converted into grayscale-luminosities", since you have a 0 to 100% setting for Red, Green, and Blue? I'm wondering if there's something more that his method gives which the channel mixer can't? Anyone know?
Using channel mixer I can also make the values of red, green, and blue add up to more or less then 100% for even more control. So I'm confused why the method above would be better. Can anyone explain this? I'm a relative newbie to this.
Message edited by author 2004-05-09 22:08:40. |
|
|
05/09/2004 10:58:49 PM · #14 |
I will try above method and will let you know how successful i was
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 05:39:34 PM EDT.