| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/30/2009 10:17:34 PM · #126 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by vawendy:
I fav'd my choice for the blue ribbon. I haven't been doing favs too often. Most of the time, I forget about it. And then I was also just fav'ing the ones that I found truly super stupendous. But I figured favs are so much fun to get, I'm going to pick 1-3 favs in each challenge. I've picked one so far--I'm going to go back and do two more.
ok, my favs have been set! |
Awww I missed out with you too...now I am gunna cry!!!! |
I didn't mean to make you cry!! I'll go fav all of them!! |
|
|
|
04/30/2009 10:29:25 PM · #127 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by vawendy:
I fav'd my choice for the blue ribbon. I haven't been doing favs too often. Most of the time, I forget about it. And then I was also just fav'ing the ones that I found truly super stupendous. But I figured favs are so much fun to get, I'm going to pick 1-3 favs in each challenge. I've picked one so far--I'm going to go back and do two more.
ok, my favs have been set! |
Awww I missed out with you too...now I am gunna cry!!!! |
I didn't mean to make you cry!! I'll go fav all of them!! |
Nahh...it's ok....I know when it gets its first fave it will be worth the wait.
|
|
|
|
04/30/2009 10:37:51 PM · #128 |
Hey Judi and Wendy,
Your chatting is very funny!!
That is sooo emotional! Despair, sorry and proud at a glance!!
|
|
|
|
04/30/2009 10:39:52 PM · #129 |
Originally posted by jotaga:
Hey Judi and Wendy,
Your chatting is very funny!!
That is sooo emotional! Despair, sorry and proud at a glance!! |
Nahhh....we are just nut cases ...lmao!
|
|
|
|
04/30/2009 10:50:40 PM · #130 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by jotaga:
Hey Judi and Wendy,
Your chatting is very funny!!
That is sooo emotional! Despair, sorry and proud at a glance!! |
Nahhh....we are just nut cases ...lmao! |
You´ll like this, Judi...
English is not my native language... i didnt know what is lmao... so i googled it and got an explanation... "In my arrogant oppinion" (as some opposite to IMHO).
o.O
It didnt make sense to me... but right after i discovered the "LMAO" version...
I´m really having fun here... (actually lmao) |
|
|
|
04/30/2009 10:53:54 PM · #131 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Awww I missed out with you too...now I am gunna cry!!!! |
Aww, come on Judi, you know you are everybody's fave! |
|
|
|
04/30/2009 11:02:03 PM · #132 |
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:
Originally posted by Judi:
Awww I missed out with you too...now I am gunna cry!!!! |
Aww, come on Judi, you know you are everybody's fave! |
Awww...now you are making me blush.....!
|
|
|
|
04/30/2009 11:10:57 PM · #133 |
| Hey spiff! Check your mail when you get a chance (before midnight, preferably!) |
|
|
|
04/30/2009 11:36:31 PM · #134 |
Done.
Voting on this one ought to be slowing down once the freestudy begins. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 02:30:06 AM · #135 |
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 11:16:57 AM · #136 |
Sharing the love,
You have rated 259 of 259 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 4 images (2%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 7.1737.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 12:12:08 PM · #137 |
Originally posted by AmeedEl-Ghoul:
Sharing the love,
You have rated 259 of 259 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have commented on 4 images (2%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 7.1737. |
Thanks, you must be part of the reason my score has gone up!:
Votes: 136
Views: 190
Avg Vote: 5.9706
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 05/01/09 12:10 pm |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 12:12:24 PM · #138 |
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
From the Challenge page:
Details: Include 1 or more trees in your composition.
Says nothing about it being the subject in the details. My pic's the same. The trees aren't the real focus, they're just part of the shot. Mind you I'm running a 6.2500 right now so I'm not complaining but he's right it doesn't say anything about the tree being the subject, just that it has to be part of the composition.
Message edited by author 2009-05-01 12:12:38. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 04:38:06 PM · #139 |
Boy I speak up and it goes really really quiet.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 05:00:36 PM · #140 |
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Boy I speak up and it goes really really quiet. |
Shhhhhh....!
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 05:23:06 PM · #141 |
I am happy this forum prompted me to read the description again because there were some VERY nice shots I am happy to change my vote on!
Message edited by author 2009-05-02 08:22:29. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 06:56:10 PM · #142 |
glad you enjoyed the comment  yo_spiff...i am pretty sure i know what one it is and its a beaut!! cant say the same for mine (its getting blasted this round!) oh well the nice thing about this website is a new challenge every week!! cheers |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 07:05:44 PM · #143 |
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
From the Challenge page:
Details: Include 1 or more trees in your composition.
Says nothing about it being the subject in the details. My pic's the same. The trees aren't the real focus, they're just part of the shot. Mind you I'm running a 6.2500 right now so I'm not complaining but he's right it doesn't say anything about the tree being the subject, just that it has to be part of the composition. |
If you're at 6.25, it doesn't sound like the majority of people have a problem with the trees not being the subject... so I guess I don't understand what the problem is... |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 07:10:38 PM · #144 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
If you're at 6.25, it doesn't sound like the majority of people have a problem with the trees not being the subject... so I guess I don't understand what the problem is... |
The problem is he feels left out if he can't complain about his score. I'm also wondering why nobody is telling me what is wrong with my entry. It's dropped to a 6.88 this afternoon and nobody will tell me what sucks so much about it.
 |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 07:20:48 PM · #145 |
Originally posted by Yo_Spiff:
Originally posted by vawendy:
If you're at 6.25, it doesn't sound like the majority of people have a problem with the trees not being the subject... so I guess I don't understand what the problem is... |
The problem is he feels left out if he can't complain about his score. I'm also wondering why nobody is telling me what is wrong with my entry. It's dropped to a 6.88 this afternoon and nobody will tell me what sucks so much about it.
|
What an awful score! I think you should give up if your entry is that bad!
edited to add: hmm, the double flag pole is odd. If everyone keeps quoting this message it could do very strange things to my brain.
Message edited by author 2009-05-01 19:21:30. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 07:25:25 PM · #146 |
Not complaining actually for myself. I'm quite happy. Just pointing it out for someone else earlier in the thread who mentioned that his score was low because some thought he was DNMC pointed out in a later reply. Thought I'd clear up that if there's a tree or more in the picture, it DMC's
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
From the Challenge page:
Details: Include 1 or more trees in your composition.
Says nothing about it being the subject in the details. My pic's the same. The trees aren't the real focus, they're just part of the shot. Mind you I'm running a 6.2500 right now so I'm not complaining but he's right it doesn't say anything about the tree being the subject, just that it has to be part of the composition. |
If you're at 6.25, it doesn't sound like the majority of people have a problem with the trees not being the subject... so I guess I don't understand what the problem is... |
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 08:07:56 PM · #147 |
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Not complaining actually for myself. I'm quite happy. Just pointing it out for someone else earlier in the thread who mentioned that his score was low because some thought he was DNMC pointed out in a later reply. Thought I'd clear up that if there's a tree or more in the picture, it DMC's
Originally posted by vawendy:
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
From the Challenge page:
Details: Include 1 or more trees in your composition.
Says nothing about it being the subject in the details. My pic's the same. The trees aren't the real focus, they're just part of the shot. Mind you I'm running a 6.2500 right now so I'm not complaining but he's right it doesn't say anything about the tree being the subject, just that it has to be part of the composition. |
If you're at 6.25, it doesn't sound like the majority of people have a problem with the trees not being the subject... so I guess I don't understand what the problem is... |
|
understandable! (But I miss the line of flagpoles...) |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 08:24:30 PM · #148 |
yay...i made it 6.5, now just got to keep my fingers crossed that it stays above that.
i also think that "trees" aren't really the main subject of my pic but more of a contributor to the composition as a whole. i almost didnt use it for the challenge because of it...i'm glad i did.
Votes: 137
Views: 230
Avg Vote: 6.5036
Comments: 5 |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 09:00:48 PM · #149 |
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
Nope. It's fully dependent on how the challenge is worded. It IS possible that EVERYONE can interpret the challenge incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 09:02:14 PM · #150 |
Originally posted by drewhosick:
Originally posted by photomill31:
My shade tree wasn't the subject, but it IS a supporting role. I find it quite interesting how people interpret the descriptions of these Challenges. Often, they are just flat wrong.
No offense, but if 98% of the pictures in the challenge have similar primary subjects and your's doesn't, could that mean that you had the incorrect interpretation? Just a thought. |
From the Challenge page:b]Details: Include 1 or more trees in your composition.[/b][/i]
Says nothing about it being the subject in the details. My pic's the same. The trees aren't the real focus, they're just part of the shot. Mind you I'm running a 6.2500 right now so I'm not complaining but he's right it doesn't say anything about the tree being the subject, just that it has to be part of the composition. |
Gratsie!
Message edited by author 2009-05-01 21:11:46.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 01:31:52 PM EDT.
