Author | Thread |
|
04/30/2004 04:59:28 PM · #1 |
Curious, as I am reading more in depth into my manual.
|
|
|
04/30/2004 05:06:49 PM · #2 |
|
|
04/30/2004 05:18:03 PM · #3 |
oops, I meant like what are all of YOUR settings. I am messing around with the customs, and I was curious how everyone else had theirs setup.
|
|
|
04/30/2004 05:23:34 PM · #4 |
I use default 99% of the time.
I like how Rob Galbraith explains things, and his reasons usually make sense to me.
//www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-6270-6325
|
|
|
04/30/2004 06:04:02 PM · #5 |
Since I always do post-processing on my pictures, I use parameter 2. |
|
|
05/02/2004 01:09:33 AM · #6 |
Either my camera is different or Rob Galbraith's info is outdated/incorrect.
My Parameter1 setting gives me Sharpness +1 not +2 |
|
|
05/02/2004 07:38:45 AM · #7 |
I use default most of the time. Reason, it just looks good.
I use custom when I am doing portraits. Reason, I increase color tone
to give more accurate rendition of skin color. |
|
|
05/02/2004 10:23:35 AM · #8 |
I just made myself a custom parameter, and I must say that the way the pictures have been coming out have been superb!
|
|
|
05/02/2004 10:55:32 AM · #9 |
custom set1 -
+2 saturation - +2 sharpness
i use this 100% of the time.
|
|
|
05/02/2004 11:18:39 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by garrywhite2: Either my camera is different or Rob Galbraith's info is outdated/incorrect.
My Parameter1 setting gives me Sharpness +1 not +2 |
Galbraith probably meant, "sharpness +2 on the 10D scale." |
|
|
05/02/2004 11:30:36 AM · #11 |
contrast +1
Sharpness +2
Saturation 0 (mid scale)
Color Tone 0 (mid scale)
100% of the time |
|
|
05/02/2004 11:33:18 AM · #12 |
hmmmm maybe i'll try that out today...
Originally posted by hopper: contrast +1
Sharpness +2
Saturation 0 (mid scale)
Color Tone 0 (mid scale)
100% of the time |
|
|
|
05/02/2004 11:34:21 AM · #13 |
i am thinking the boosted saturation may add noise to images.
but have nothing to back that claim up
|
|
|
05/03/2004 04:26:12 AM · #14 |
could reducing saturation possibly result in less noisy pics? |
|
|
05/03/2004 05:01:01 AM · #15 |
I've been using para 2 for quite a while for the same reason as Dyslexic. I'm curious now and might try contrast +1 and Sharpness +2 to see how it compares |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/27/2025 05:34:15 AM EDT.