DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Difference Between 50mm 1.8 and 1.8 II
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
10/23/2008 04:13:53 PM · #1
I have acquired an older 50mm f/1.8 that was riding in my B-in-L's film camera bag. I was pleasantly surprised at the heft and finish. I have handled the 50mm f/1.8II and I seem to recall it was quite a bit lighter and cheaper-feeling... Or maybe I'm fooling myself? How do they compare optically? One thing I definitely like is the earlier version has a focusing scale, which I don't recall the newer one having... Or am i wrong on that too?

R.
10/23/2008 04:17:17 PM · #2
From memory Robt the optics are the same, yes you have the focusing scale on the MK1 and best of all the MK1 has a metal mount. Its also a much better/more sturdy build - mine cost me more than a brand new MKII but still bang for buck probably the best lens in my bag :)
10/23/2008 04:19:07 PM · #3
From Wikipedia:

EF 50mm f/1.8
The EF 50mm f/1.8 is a discontinued economy level lens, which has been replaced by the EF 50mm f/1.8 II. It is constructed with a plastic body and a metal mount, and features a distance window with infrared index. A 5 blade maximum aperture of f/1.8 gives this lens the ability to create depth of field effects.
The optical construction of this lens contains 6 lens elements, with no special elements. This lens uses a front extension focusing system, powered by an AFD motor, Front of the lens does not rotate when focusing, making it compatible with circular polarisers.
Auto focus speed, despite the AFD motor, is moderately fast although audible.

[ edit ]
EF 50mm f/1.8 II
The EF 50mm f/1.8 II replaced the EF 50mm f/1.8. Because of its low price but relatively high optical quality, this lens has excellent value. It is constructed with a plastic body and mount and has a very simple design with no features.
Changes compared to the mk I model are the plastic mount, the absence of a distance window, a micro motor instead of an arc-form drive and a rotating lens front. Optically, this lens is almost identical to the first version.
The focus ring on this lens is even smaller than the one on the mk I model and placed on the front of the outer barrel. Also unlike the earlier model, it isn't decoupled in AF-mode, so accidently turning it can cause damage to the autofocus mechanism.

10/23/2008 04:23:06 PM · #4
doh zueszen beat me!
10/23/2008 04:54:26 PM · #5
Originally posted by DrAchoo:

doh zueszen beat me!


Crybaby.
10/23/2008 04:57:08 PM · #6
Well that's good, I have the better version :-) Happy Birthday to me!

R.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 12/27/2025 10:25:04 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/27/2025 10:25:04 AM EST.