| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/09/2008 01:36:18 PM · #126 |
Originally posted by biteme:
I get 25.59
(but I'm sure I did something wrong, hahaha!) |
Actually, 4.3. Not bad! |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:36:59 PM · #127 |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:37:24 PM · #128 |
Originally posted by AP:
Originally posted by Patrick_R:
Originally posted by AP:
I know its stupid, but my day gets a little bit happier every time I get a new fave. |
Ahh there you are! I've always loved you post processing. Based on your statement you should be having a REALLY happy day today lol. |
haha, it dawned on me afterward that that may have looked like I was fishing for profile views which I was NOT but... Thank you! |
Hmmph! Posting in this thread didn't get me any faves.
Snicker.
|
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:39:23 PM · #129 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Fame can be easily determined mathematically.
1. Go into your profile.
2. Take the number next to "selected as favorite photographer."
3. Square your Average Vote Received.
4. Divide #2 by #3.
This is your fame quotient. The higher the number, the more famous you are. Mine is 3.22 |
5.60 - Whooh hooh!
|
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:40:23 PM · #130 |
Originally posted by levyj413:
Originally posted by AP:
Originally posted by Patrick_R:
Originally posted by AP:
I know its stupid, but my day gets a little bit happier every time I get a new fave. |
Ahh there you are! I've always loved you post processing. Based on your statement you should be having a REALLY happy day today lol. |
haha, it dawned on me afterward that that may have looked like I was fishing for profile views which I was NOT but... Thank you! |
Hmmph! Posting in this thread didn't get me any faves.
Snicker. |
Me neither! LOL! ...and with a 1.5 quite expected. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:41:45 PM · #131 |
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
Originally posted by posthumous:
Fame can be easily determined mathematically.
1. Go into your profile.
2. Take the number next to "selected as favorite photographer."
3. Square your Average Vote Received.
4. Divide #2 by #3.
This is your fame quotient. The higher the number, the more famous you are. Mine is 3.22 |
5.60 - Whooh hooh! |
Hmmm... I'm starting to see flaws in my formula...
I may need to recalibrate... |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:45:32 PM · #132 |
I am 4.20 famous.
The really famous
Joey Lawrence-35.05
Heida-33.90
librodo-32.23
kiwiness-29.21 |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:50:02 PM · #133 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
Originally posted by posthumous:
Fame can be easily determined mathematically.
1. Go into your profile.
2. Take the number next to "selected as favorite photographer."
3. Square your Average Vote Received.
4. Divide #2 by #3.
This is your fame quotient. The higher the number, the more famous you are. Mine is 3.22 |
5.60 - Whooh hooh! |
Hmmm... I'm starting to see flaws in my formula...
I may need to recalibrate... |
seriously (not) -- your formula works for those with the "dpc-friendly" images and high-scorers. can you work something up that helps us not quite so "standard" photogs? :)
(Mine was 2.5) |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:50:32 PM · #134 |
| I was about to raise my hand until I noticed that the title didnt say infamous. Bleh :P |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:51:17 PM · #135 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Fame can be easily determined mathematically.
1. Go into your profile.
2. Take the number next to "selected as favorite photographer."
3. Square your Average Vote Received.
4. Divide #2 by #3.
This is your fame quotient. The higher the number, the more famous you are. Mine is 3.22 |
Mine is 0.01. Couple more low scoring entries and I'll dissapear.... (or need more decimal places.)
No! Wait! The lower my average score, the bigger my favorites look. Brown ribbon, here I come!
Message edited by author 2008-09-09 13:57:21. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 01:55:01 PM · #136 |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:04:13 PM · #137 |
Nevermind, i have no clue what mine is any more lol....
Message edited by author 2008-09-09 14:06:06.
|
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:04:23 PM · #138 |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:04:44 PM · #139 |
Originally posted by levyj413:
Originally posted by AP:
Originally posted by Patrick_R:
Originally posted by AP:
I know its stupid, but my day gets a little bit happier every time I get a new fave. |
Ahh there you are! I've always loved you post processing. Based on your statement you should be having a REALLY happy day today lol. |
haha, it dawned on me afterward that that may have looked like I was fishing for profile views which I was NOT but... Thank you! |
Hmmph! Posting in this thread didn't get me any faves.
Snicker. |
Did too! :) |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:07:55 PM · #140 |
I must be pretty obscure, it's a negative number. : )
Actually, for me it's about 1.4, the on the far horizon of fame threshold LOL.
I think that we are all wrong, I did all the steps, and when I divide 2by 3 it is .66666667 every time.
It's all in the spin you put on it.
|
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:09:22 PM · #141 |
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
5.60 - Whooh hooh! |
9.73. Neener!
Message edited by author 2008-09-09 14:09:41. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:10:04 PM · #142 |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:13:26 PM · #143 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Fame can be easily determined mathematically.
1. Go into your profile.
2. Take the number next to "selected as favorite photographer."
3. Square your Average Vote Received.
4. Divide #2 by #3.
This is your fame quotient. The higher the number, the more famous you are. Mine is 3.22 |
Look what you started..lol |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:15:23 PM · #144 |
Originally posted by karmat:
seriously (not) -- your formula works for those with the "dpc-friendly" images and high-scorers. can you work something up that helps us not quite so "standard" photogs? :)
(Mine was 2.5) |
Actually, my formula penalizes high scores.
But clearly not enough. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:16:18 PM · #145 |
You guys can use any math formula you want, but I bet that I am the most famous (and imfamous) person on this site...
There is a Hall of Fame for DPC, right? |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:22:45 PM · #146 |
| 1.09.... crawling back under my rock of obscurity now. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:24:06 PM · #147 |
At first I thought it worked.
Then â€Â¦ I came to the realization that I slightly more famous than Whiterook!
2.76 vs. 2.68
Could that be true? |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:25:01 PM · #148 |
Math is evil! Evil, I tell you! It's just behind clowns and just ahead of polyester leisure suits!
|
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:27:50 PM · #149 |
NEW REVISED HYPOALLERGENIC FAME FORMULA
1. Take your "selected as favorite photographer" total.
2. Subtract 4 from your Avg Vote Received.
3. Take the square of #2.
4. Divide #1 by #3.
5. Round to nearest integer.
I am 72!
DrAchoo is only 69. Sorry, DrAchoo...
Message edited by author 2008-09-09 14:28:39. |
|
|
|
09/09/2008 02:28:54 PM · #150 |
| And I'm still stayin' under my rock. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/20/2025 04:41:01 PM EDT.
