| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 02:59:03 AM · #1 | 
		| | check following Links for Ultimate DSLR DSLR 1
 
 DSLR 2
 
 I wish i was bit  good in electronics , would love to do this experiment
 
 Message edited by author 2004-03-27 03:01:56.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 10:59:00 AM · #2 | 
		| | No one found   the links great? 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 11:14:27 AM · #3 | 
		| | very very cool.  people are so brilliant.  me, i'll stick with my camera as is but it's great to see folks out there monkeying with technology. 
 thanks for sharing!
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 11:20:25 AM · #4 | 
		| | Just had a look! Very interesting, I especially liked Andrew Davidhazy's infrared experiments with his scannng camera.
 I've seen some awesome panoramas done with very expensive commercial scanning cameras, the results can be outrageously good. I believe the ones I looked at were done using film, however.
 It would be fun to experiemnt with a set-up like this. Lots of old scanners out there for the scavenging.  I know I'll never get to it, however, time being the issue.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 11:22:36 AM · #5 | 
		| | lol... nifty find.  Very interesting what people can come up with! 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 11:55:23 AM · #6 | 
		| | wish I were younger and able to tinker like Matthius.  (I have a son who isn't afraid of taking things apart and actually getting them back together again.) I also enjoyed his web page..thanks for sharing. 
 Message edited by author 2004-03-27 11:58:43.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 12:06:41 PM · #7 | 
		| | I wish  i had  some knwoledge  of electronics, some good mechanical mind, I am seriously thinking  about this Project, even love to  learn electronics but don't where to learn from. 
 Just curious, Considering he  wrote  that i have  a camera with 2000x2000 pixel, will there be a quality difference in pixel of a camera and  a scanner
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 12:07:54 PM · #8 | 
		| | Interesting that someone would go through an enormous amount of time and effort to turn a scanner into a digital camera and then shoot a coin that would have been a cinch to capture with the scanner in the first place. No? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 12:40:46 PM · #9 | 
		| | Very cool link, however I fail to see how that would qualify as a DSLR. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 12:42:46 PM · #10 | 
		| | | Originally posted by Jacko: Very cool link, however I fail to see how that would qualify as a DSLR.
 | 
 
 i get the D part.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 01:58:12 PM · #11 | 
		| | well since  most people must have got the D part, S for single lens used, L for  lens used, 
 So it is not a DSLR, its a DSL
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/27/2004 01:59:04 PM · #12 | 
		| | | Originally posted by General: well since  most people must have got the D part, S for single lens used, L for  lens used,
 
 So it is not a DSLR, its a DSL
 | 
 
 lol, now it sounds like a modem.
 
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 03:47:01 PM EDT.