| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/19/2008 08:46:32 PM · #1 |
So, I have a dillema between these two lenses :
Sigma 70-300 and Canon 75-300
Sigma looks like a better deal from the photos I've seen on DPC but I would like to hear a word from the owners!
Thanks
Message edited by author 2008-06-19 21:31:02. |
|
|
|
06/20/2008 01:26:09 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
06/20/2008 01:31:12 PM · #3 |
I used to own the sigma ... it's good ... not great ... but better than the canon
focus is slow-ish and will hunt a bit, but it's pretty sharp and has excellent macro ability
|
|
|
|
06/20/2008 03:13:12 PM · #4 |
I`ve used both and the sigma is better all round. It`s a touch sharper better built and the macro feature is useful if you have no macro lens.
These are from the sigma
And one from the canon  |
|
|
|
06/20/2008 06:01:46 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by hopper: I used to own the sigma ... it's good ... not great ... but better than the canon
focus is slow-ish and will hunt a bit, but it's pretty sharp and has excellent macro ability |
Hopper, your photo is excellent, but the thing which confuses me is that you stated that the aperture was 2.8, while in the specification for this lense I found that the maximum aperture is f/4 ?!
********************
oh, just noticed that this photo is your signature, probably has nothing to do with the sigma lense :-)
Message edited by author 2008-06-20 18:19:19. |
|
|
|
06/20/2008 08:31:19 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Zigomar: oh, just noticed that this photo is your signature, probably has nothing to do with the sigma lense :-) |
right :)
thanks though |
|
|
|
06/21/2008 12:03:52 PM · #7 |
Any other opinion?!
Thanks |
|
|
|
06/22/2008 04:37:38 AM · #8 |
| I can vouch for the sigma, very good for the price. Macro is a good introduction to this kind of photography, but a bit limited as it's avalable between 200-300mm. If you want to photograph tiny things, you 'll be using it @300mm for the 1:2 macro, and the depth of field at this focal length is so thin that no tripod will help, unless you have a macro rail. Quality is excellent though, for the price. |
|
|
|
06/22/2008 10:59:27 AM · #9 |
|
|
|
06/25/2008 11:41:17 AM · #10 |
| I'm with LoudDog - no question. |
|
|
|
06/25/2008 01:33:26 PM · #11 |
The Sigma's an excellent lens - the focus speed leaves a little to be desired but for the price it's surprisingly sharp and well built.
Example:
 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/27/2025 05:35:18 PM EST.