| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/12/2008 02:41:22 PM · #1 |
| When signing and dating a print, is it common practice to sign the year of creation of the digital photo or the physical print? |
|
|
|
06/12/2008 02:43:59 PM · #2 |
I believe its proper to (if you date it) use the date the print is made. I prefer signature only.
|
|
|
|
06/12/2008 02:49:34 PM · #3 |
I was recently researching a signed print of my mother's. The painting was signed and dated 1952, then hand-signed with the date of signing in 1957, so yeah, what Cindi said :)
Message edited by author 2008-06-12 22:24:33. |
|
|
|
06/12/2008 04:04:59 PM · #4 |
Cool, thanks.
Dated the prints by date of printing... too late to go back now :-P
The prints in question are a result of this sale... Sold 25 prints, I'm pretty stoked on that! |
|
|
|
06/12/2008 10:26:10 PM · #5 |
| Those are lovely shots :) |
|
|
|
06/12/2008 10:48:52 PM · #6 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/08/2025 11:00:23 AM EDT.
