Author | Thread |
|
05/22/2008 01:51:48 AM · #1 |
Here is the modified version of my entry in Soft FocusIV. I kindly welcome any suggestions for further improvements.
I forgot to mention this image is not soft focused. Don't see this image from that aspect.I want to improve this image with your kind feedback.
Message edited by author 2008-05-26 09:46:52. |
|
|
05/22/2008 01:59:39 AM · #2 |
Can his soft submission be disqualified post voting..... he admits to using guassian blur and he took 7th place, meaning he did not take a soft photo at all, just photoshopped one.
I wasnt part of soft but I think this is wildly unfair to those behind him |
|
|
05/22/2008 02:03:33 AM · #3 |
I do believe guassian blur is legal in basic. Mute issue....
Originally posted by CarpeLumen: Can his soft submission be disqualified post voting..... he admits to using guassian blur and he took 7th place, meaning he did not take a soft photo at all, just photoshopped one.
I wasnt part of soft but I think this is wildly unfair to those behind him |
|
|
|
05/22/2008 02:05:15 AM · #4 |
You did desat didn't you? I'm not crazy about it but the detail you captured in the hands is really good. Good balance--shadows maybe a little heavy on the RH side.
Gaus blur is a legal and accepted(mostly) way to replicate soft focus. Some would argue that GB isn't as authentic as other methods, but seems OK to me.
Eta: I prefer your entry FWIW.
Message edited by author 2008-05-22 02:07:56. |
|
|
05/22/2008 02:06:33 AM · #5 |
I misread that line in the rules, my bad..... Sorry man I owe you a pint |
|
|
05/22/2008 02:25:46 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by mpeters: You did desat didn't you? I'm not crazy about it but the detail you captured in the hands is really good. Good balance--shadows maybe a little heavy on the RH side.
Gaus blur is a legal and accepted(mostly) way to replicate soft focus. Some would argue that GB isn't as authentic as other methods, but seems OK to me.
Eta: I prefer your entry FWIW. |
Thanks for your good comment. Sorry for my ignorance but I didn't understand "FWIW"
OK got it does it means "For What It's Worth"?
Message edited by author 2008-05-22 02:34:51. |
|
|
05/22/2008 06:23:01 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by CarpeLumen: I misread that line in the rules, my bad..... Sorry man I owe you a pint |
There is a saying "don't jump on conclusion otherwise conclusion will jump on you.." Never mind. I know it happens. Earlier I misread the rules too & missed my two ribbons, it's really painful. Now I am paying more attention on the rules. |
|
|
05/22/2008 07:47:08 AM · #8 |
I like the version that you entered better that the one above. Well done. |
|
|
05/24/2008 08:02:32 AM · #9 |
still working on it. Here is the latest version.
Any suggestions are welcomed.
|
|
|
05/24/2008 08:13:36 PM · #10 |
I do like this version. You can however see a slight line around the hands where the selection was made. Dont know if that is me being really picky and whether most people would notice it or not. |
|
|
05/24/2008 10:13:31 PM · #11 |
Thank You Monique64. Actually I wanted to add a golden light glow below the hands. Should I further add or remove it completely? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/08/2025 12:37:02 PM EDT.