| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/14/2008 12:58:52 AM · #1 |
//i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg276/ericayooo/whatareyouon.gif
i was wondering how i can do this to a pic to give a "dunken" feel to it...
it looks realy sweet and it kind of like looks like is moving... but it does really give a true drunk look...
suggestions PLEASE!!!! :) =] :-p |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 01:23:04 AM · #2 |
step 1: drink lots of vodka when taking the image
step 2: drink lots of tequila when viewing the image |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 01:35:48 AM · #3 |
| I'm not 100% sure how to do it on a photo, but I did do something similar to that font in college. I just copied my words several times. I changed the opacity of the copied words, then layered them a little staggered on top of each other. I'm guessing the process would be somewhat similar with a picture. |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 01:42:56 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by icu1965:
I'm not 100% sure how to do it on a photo, but I did do something similar to that font in college. I just copied my words several times. I changed the opacity of the copied words, then layered them a little staggered on top of each other. I'm guessing the process would be somewhat similar with a picture. |
That would work for a font, since it has lots of transparent areas within the "bounding box" of the words. With an image, however, the opaque image in the middle would block any partially-transparent layers that are offset from it, with the exception of the very edges. It is unlikely, therefore, that the subject would show any blurring at all.
You could get something close by zooming during the exposure.
|
|
|
|
05/14/2008 02:10:09 AM · #5 |
Once I was experimenting with exposure bracketing & acceidently mixed different images & got that kind of effect. Here is that one.
 |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 02:15:50 AM · #6 |
| how exactly did you do thaT? |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 02:19:31 AM · #7 |
| Well these are two different images in same shootout but with difference in their position & merged in a single layer adjusting the opacity of one layer slightly less than dominant layer. |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 02:59:21 AM · #8 |
| take to shots of the same subject, put on opacity at 70 and the other at full, put it at whatever degree off of the one at 100% you want( keep them kinda close) and then motion blur from the same angle at desired amount. |
|
|
|
05/14/2008 06:13:10 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by geoffb:
Originally posted by icu1965:
I'm not 100% sure how to do it on a photo, but I did do something similar to that font in college. I just copied my words several times. I changed the opacity of the copied words, then layered them a little staggered on top of each other. I'm guessing the process would be somewhat similar with a picture. |
That would work for a font, since it has lots of transparent areas within the "bounding box" of the words. With an image, however, the opaque image in the middle would block any partially-transparent layers that are offset from it, with the exception of the very edges. It is unlikely, therefore, that the subject would show any blurring at all.
You could get something close by zooming during the exposure. |
sorry geoff, but actually it would work fine with layers set at lower opacity. the bottom layer would be 100%, then subsequent, offset layers at lower opacities. they will be on top, so they will show. zooming will create a cool effect, but it won't be what was illustrated by the OP, and is less controllable.
|
|
|
|
05/14/2008 03:49:04 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by xianart:
sorry geoff, but actually it would work fine with layers set at lower opacity. the bottom layer would be 100%, then subsequent, offset layers at lower opacities. they will be on top, so they will show. zooming will create a cool effect, but it won't be what was illustrated by the OP, and is less controllable. |
Ahh, of course. You're right. For some reason, I was thinking the layer at 100% opacity would be on top.
Thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/09/2025 09:16:22 AM EDT.
