DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Individual Photograph Discussion >> Porn or Erotic Art? - (NSFW)
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 50 of 94, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 02/04/2008 05:33:51 PM · #26
WTH! I leave you guys alone for a few minutes and come back to animated lesbian sex ... gosh I love DPC... LOL
 02/04/2008 06:20:58 PM · #27
except they're men in that animated video...


02/04/2008 06:22:50 PM · #28
Not porn to my eyes...maybe soft porn if it was in the context of a set of images but isolated I'd call that "erotica". Mind you, if you changed the title to something a bit more racy like "Strap on and hang on" or something similarly outrageous it would instantly become porn, irrespective of the reality of the image.

N
 02/04/2008 06:27:09 PM · #29
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by Bujanx:
You know the old saying 'fluid free, safe for me!'


LMAO, never heard that... :-D


Most likely because I just made it up =)
 02/04/2008 07:33:44 PM · #30
Bujanx is a funny man. :o))

OK - porn or erotic art... In my opinion (and this applies to everything I say from hereon out), it's not so much what the models are doing as how it is presented. The light is bright and though not harsh, definitely not arty. The surroundings - wall, tile, thing she's sitting on - are unarty and unerotic - too real. Sort of reminds me of the home porn photos (not the models - just the stuff around the models).

I feel what constitutes erotic art is that it is removed from reality - enough removed to not remind us of anything sexual per se. Mysterious lighting, shrouded surroundings, sensual backdrops... or if that's not your style, something industrial, the abandoned warehouse, the abandoned chapel, the meadow... you get my drift? In any case it shouldn't look like our living room. Erotic art is a fantasy of some sort (of course your fantasy might be one girl looking at another girl's butt in the living room) and I feel the lighting and surroundings are instrumental in achieving that effect.

As to the models - it's a bit awkward. I mean, that can't be comfortable. :op
 02/04/2008 07:40:51 PM · #31
T'was not at all comfy for the butt model.
 02/04/2008 07:48:10 PM · #32
Alicia , btw... I feel completely different about the background. IMO, a "background" is bout the most un-artful thing you can shoot on.

02/04/2008 07:54:04 PM · #33
Originally posted by redjulep:
Bujanx is a funny man. :o))

OK - porn or erotic art... In my opinion (and this applies to everything I say from hereon out), it's not so much what the models are doing as how it is presented. The light is bright and though not harsh, definitely not arty. The surroundings - wall, tile, thing she's sitting on - are unarty and unerotic - too real. Sort of reminds me of the home porn photos (not the models - just the stuff around the models).

I feel what constitutes erotic art is that it is removed from reality - enough removed to not remind us of anything sexual per se. Mysterious lighting, shrouded surroundings, sensual backdrops... or if that's not your style, something industrial, the abandoned warehouse, the abandoned chapel, the meadow... you get my drift? In any case it shouldn't look like our living room. Erotic art is a fantasy of some sort (of course your fantasy might be one girl looking at another girl's butt in the living room) and I feel the lighting and surroundings are instrumental in achieving that effect.

As to the models - it's a bit awkward. I mean, that can't be comfortable. :op


Based on the above statement, which I agree with 100%. I believe the image to be pornographic. It lacks the artistic integrity that the majority of you work possesses.
 02/04/2008 07:59:23 PM · #34
Skinamax Porn
 02/04/2008 08:12:25 PM · #35
That butt model has a mighty small butt for a female.
 02/04/2008 08:16:26 PM · #36
What are these images supposed to represent? What is the purpose?
 02/04/2008 08:16:59 PM · #37
Originally posted by moswyn:
That butt model has a mighty small butt for a female.


She would totally disagree... LOL ... I think the pose might have minimized it a bit, but the girl does have some junk in the trunk
 02/04/2008 08:17:59 PM · #38
Originally posted by iamkmaniam:
What are these images supposed to represent? What is the purpose?

Hotness? Just a guess. ;-)
 02/04/2008 08:27:51 PM · #39
Geez Leroy! you sure do have a lot of nudes in your profile. I always have the filter on since I usually view this at work. I think you're the reason we have this option, LOL! You have some good stuff.

When i'm 80 and know men won't be using my photos for their special "me time", I'll be sure to call you for some shots :)
 02/04/2008 08:32:37 PM · #40
Originally posted by Chinabun:

When i'm 80 and know men won't be using my photos for their special "me time", I'll be sure to call you for some shots :)


OK.. I'm gonna hold ya to it. :-D
02/04/2008 08:32:44 PM · #41
Originally posted by inshaala:
Still - you could try her - post your contact details with a local porn agency as a photographer; wait for the call; get the pornstar around with male/female counterpart - have them have a bit of a romp in your studio and take pics - see what the wife says then! ;)

Since my 'studio' is either our living room or the occasional use of her place of business, that might be really interesting.
 02/04/2008 08:59:11 PM · #42
Don't bother Eug... that industry is a pain in the ass and I'm not talking about the anal scenes.
 02/04/2008 09:32:40 PM · #43
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by moswyn:
That butt model has a mighty small butt for a female.


She would totally disagree... LOL ... I think the pose might have minimized it a bit, but the girl does have some junk in the trunk


Hey Leroy, if you were a GWC this would be funny, but seeing how your portraying yourself as a professional, a comment like the one above can land you in court. At least where I live it can.
 02/04/2008 09:35:53 PM · #44
Originally posted by iamkmaniam:
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by moswyn:
That butt model has a mighty small butt for a female.


She would totally disagree... LOL ... I think the pose might have minimized it a bit, but the girl does have some junk in the trunk


Hey Leroy, if you were a GWC this would be funny, but seeing how your portraying yourself as a professional, a comment like the one above can land you in court. At least where I live it can.


OK explain... HOW could THAT wind someone up in court? I gotta hear this one.
 02/04/2008 09:40:47 PM · #45
"Junk in the trunk" is a very derogatory term where I live, and can be rightfully perceived as slander.

"Junk in the trunk" where I live is calling someone a fat a**

Message edited by author 2008-02-04 21:45:28.
 02/04/2008 09:42:52 PM · #46
Originally posted by iamkmaniam:
"Junk in the trunk" is a very derogatory term where I live, and can be rightfully perceived as slander.


Its a compliment around here!!! LOL
 02/04/2008 09:46:42 PM · #47
Originally posted by iamkmaniam:
"Junk in the trunk" is a very derogatory term where I live, and can be rightfully perceived as slander.


I think you might want to go study Defamation law a bit more. Sorry.
Anyway, both girls are friends and the butt model will tell you she's got a big ol' butt.

02/04/2008 09:48:36 PM · #48
Originally posted by iamkmaniam:

"Junk in the trunk" where I live is calling someone a fat a**


IF it's true... there is no defamation. Truth is absolute defense. Opinion is also a defense in most jurisdictions when not presented as absolute fact.

Did I tell ya I made straight A's in Media Lw and ethics in college?
 02/04/2008 09:52:43 PM · #49
badonkadonk, junk in the trunk, delicious rump, onion, apple all wonderful euphemisms! :-P

Laughing my keister off

;-))

Message edited by author 2008-02-04 21:53:25.
 02/04/2008 09:54:15 PM · #50
You win. never mind sorry I tried to interject some usefulness into this conversation.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 06/23/2025 07:31:22 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/23/2025 07:31:22 AM EDT.