Time keeps on slippin' into the future-Scores

01/09/2008 06:34:22 PM · #152

Originally posted by MAK:

Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

Am beating you MAK (on views and votes lol) now, is that a 2 or a 3? I can smell another ribbon for you :)

Votes: 226
Views: 622
Avg Vote: 6.6018
Comments: 25
Favorites: 1

Leica 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 Vario Elmar-T ASPH

01/09/2008 06:50:38 PM · #153

Originally posted by MAK:

Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

I left you a comment. But, more importantly, got yer river ready? ;)

MAK

Leica M Monochrom

01/09/2008 06:57:00 PM · #154

Originally posted by mpeters:

Originally posted by MAK:
Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

I left you a comment. But, more importantly, got yer river ready? ;)

Of cause I have, have you got Jaime beat then?

Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C

01/09/2008 06:59:13 PM · #155

Originally posted by MAK:

Originally posted by mpeters:

Originally posted by MAK:
Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

I left you a comment. But, more importantly, got yer river ready? ;)

Of cause I have, have you got Jaime beat then?

...like a drum. (I think) You're a pretty tough draw for the round of 16!

BHuseman

Nikon D750

01/09/2008 07:02:10 PM · #156

You know how you can tell your image is wierd? When your views are triple that of your votes. Crazy...

Votes: 231
Views: 738
Avg Vote: 4.0173
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/09/08 07:00 pm
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

Leica 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 Vario Elmar-T ASPH

01/09/2008 07:04:34 PM · #157

Originally posted by BHuseman:

You know how you can tell your image is wierd? When your views are triple that of your votes. Crazy...

Votes: 231
Views: 738
Avg Vote: 4.0173
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/09/08 07:00 pm
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

Holy views batman!

MAK

Leica M Monochrom

01/09/2008 07:04:52 PM · #158

Originally posted by mpeters:

Originally posted by MAK:

Originally posted by mpeters:

Originally posted by MAK:
Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

I left you a comment. But, more importantly, got yer river ready? ;)

Of cause I have, have you got Jaime beat then?

...like a drum. (I think) You're a pretty tough draw for the round of 16!

You have some pretty good RIVER shots in your profile too dude... It will surely be a tough one

Quasimojo

Canon EOS-30D

Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE OSS

01/09/2008 07:24:14 PM · #159

Originally posted by DrAchoo:

Comments: 16

You get lots of comments when there is apparently one specific thing wrong with your picture... :)

Comments: 24

Yep :)

Bear_Music

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

01/09/2008 07:51:14 PM · #160

Just got a fascinating comment:

"The time lapse is good, but if i didn't know it was time lapse, i might not realise that it's one person moving across the path, but think it was just several people"

That one makes me scratch my head, it's intensely philosophical :-)

R.

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

01/09/2008 07:56:38 PM · #161

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

retracted. my apologies.

Message edited by author 2008-01-09 21:29:18.

desertoddity

Nikon D300s

01/09/2008 08:14:47 PM · #162

i have been trying to comment on every photo in this challenge, but if my comments are just going to be posted in this thread for sarcasm and ridicule, then forget it.

BAMartin

Apple iPhone 5

01/09/2008 08:20:17 PM · #163

Originally posted by desertoddity:

i have been trying to comment on every photo in this challenge, but if my comments are just going to be posted in this thread for sarcasm and ridicule, then forget it.

He said it was fascinating. Does not sound like ridicule to me.

Nuzzer

Canon EOS-7D

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS

01/09/2008 08:22:06 PM · #164

Originally posted by desertoddity:

i have been trying to comment on every photo in this challenge, but if my comments are just going to be posted in this thread for sarcasm and ridicule, then forget it.

Yes, the comment should not have been posted as it identifies the image too. But please keep commenting because you haven't got to my shot yet.

glad2badad

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Lensbaby Sweet 35 Optic

01/09/2008 08:27:48 PM · #165

Originally posted by Bear_Music:

Philosophical in what way? Sounds to me like the commenter was saying that if the category of photography had not been known to the viewer, the image wouldn't portray 'Time Lapse' on it's own. Perhaps the person moving in the image has more spacing than what some would think of for time lapse. Just a thought.

ralph

Nikon Z9

01/10/2008 07:25:34 AM · #166

Votes: 233
Views: 595
Avg Vote: ******
Comments: 22
Favorites: 3

!!!! ....
(not ribbonable but still nice :)

Quasimojo

Canon EOS-30D

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

01/10/2008 09:09:14 AM · #167

Originally posted by glad2badad:

Perhaps the person moving in the image has more spacing than what some would think of for time lapse. Just a thought.

The spacing between subjects in theory is up to the photographer and the time interval set between shots. Whether those intervals are too long and imply removed frames is an SC task imho, not ours (i.e. the natural or burst argument).

desertoddity

Nikon D300s

01/10/2008 09:17:27 AM · #168

i'll be happy to explain what i meant when the challenge is over, if anyone still wants to know.

glad2badad

Apple iPhone 16 Pro

Lensbaby Sweet 35 Optic

01/10/2008 09:29:21 AM · #169

Originally posted by fastforward:

Originally posted by glad2badad:
Perhaps the person moving in the image has more spacing than what some would think of for time lapse. Just a thought.

The spacing between subjects in theory is up to the photographer and the time interval set between shots. Whether those intervals are too long and imply removed frames is an SC task imho, not ours (i.e. the natural or burst argument).

No, no. I wasn't taking any stand on the legitimacy of what is/isn't time lapse. No questioning here on validity, I was just trying to politely point out that the viewers/voters can and will see this from different viewpoints - hence different "philosophies". :-)

Lonz

Sony DSLR-A700

Sony DT 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Aspherical ED High Magnification Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha

01/11/2008 12:52:51 AM · #170

Votes: 247
Views: 535
Avg Vote: 6.0648
Comments: 20

Judi

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C

01/11/2008 01:01:34 AM · #171

Originally posted by MAK:

Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

....errr...and the BIG girls!!!! I am dancing with ya mate....now don't step on my toes!

Originally posted by BHuseman:

Votes: 261
Views: 775
Avg Vote: X.XXXX
Comments: 41
Favorites: 3

I gotcha covered!

BHuseman

Nikon D750

01/11/2008 01:04:36 AM · #172

Sorry Judi, but in views I think you are still lagging a little behind:

Votes: 264
Views: 869
Avg Vote: 4.0265
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/11/08 01:02 am
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

Originally posted by Judi:

Originally posted by MAK:
Votes: 220
Views: 581
Avg Vote: 7.*500
Comments: 35

I know all the big boys are keeping quiet. I just hope this will hold out now.

....errr...and the BIG girls!!!! I am dancing with ya mate....now don't step on my toes!

Originally posted by BHuseman:
You know how you can tell your image is wierd? When your views are triple that of your votes. Crazy...

Votes: 231
Views: 738
Avg Vote: 4.0173
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/09/08 07:00 pm
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

Votes: 261
Views: 775
Avg Vote: X.XXXX
Comments: 41
Favorites: 3

I gotcha covered!

Judi

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C

01/11/2008 01:06:13 AM · #173

Originally posted by BHuseman:

Oooh..yes...but I have you on the score and comments.

BHuseman

Nikon D750

01/11/2008 01:43:43 AM · #174

Sorry to dissapoint again, but I have you on comments as well:

Votes: 266
Views: 873
Avg Vote: 4.0338
Comments: 47
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/11/08 01:43 am
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

I have been downgrading my comments.

Originally posted by Judi:

Originally posted by BHuseman:
Sorry Judi, but in views I think you are still lagging a little behind:

Votes: 264
Views: 869
Avg Vote: 4.0265
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 01/11/08 01:02 am
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.

Oooh..yes...but I have you on the score and comments.

Judi

Canon EOS-5D Mark III