| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/12/2007 02:04:50 AM · #1 |
...a little bit much
read it carefully |
|
|
|
12/12/2007 02:20:10 AM · #2 |
didn't find anything special in what he said. |
|
|
|
12/12/2007 02:29:39 AM · #3 |
He writes:
"D3 is clearly better than any previous Nikon DSLR, though again how much better is open to question and requires a lot more use and testing to determine."
I find the statement to be completely idiotic.
|
|
|
|
12/12/2007 02:32:23 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by Gringo:
He writes:
"D3 is clearly better than any previous Nikon DSLR, though again how much better is open to question and requires a lot more use and testing to determine."
I find the statement to be completely idiotic. |
exactly. |
|
|
|
12/12/2007 07:05:32 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Gringo:
He writes:
"D3 is clearly better than any previous Nikon DSLR, though again how much better is open to question and requires a lot more use and testing to determine."
I find the statement to be completely idiotic. |
Sounds pretty clear cut to me. The author of the statement has observed the output of the D3 and it's clearly better than any other Nikon DSLR he's seen. And that guy has seen them all, and tested them all. At the time he wrote the statement, few had them in hand, and *NONE* were allowed to test dynamic range and other factors, and disclose such results to the public, due to non-disclosure agreements with Nikon. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/29/2025 11:38:49 PM EST.
