Author | Thread |
|
02/17/2004 08:11:23 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by EddyG: Actually, In The Garden had 350 entries... |
In The Garden wasn't "since Still Life". :) |
|
|
02/17/2004 08:11:51 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by jonpink: I just entered so that's one more...
Waiting for a lot of rope photographs..;) |
I was thinking that too... :) |
|
|
02/17/2004 08:36:57 PM · #28 |
Have submited mine.
Sadly, I do not think I have managed the best from the image under Basic Editing, playing with advanced editing after the challenge may help it!
But DPC is not only about personal satisfaction. I hope others may appreciate it sufficiently to reward the effort.
Can not wait for the voting to start.
:~) |
|
|
02/17/2004 08:53:40 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by visitor:
Can not wait for the voting to start.
:~) |
I submitted the day of the notice of what the challenge was, last tues, how do u think i feel? :)
|
|
|
02/17/2004 10:10:30 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by jonpink: I just entered so that's one more...
Waiting for a lot of rope photographs..;) |
I just entered to
So now is 380 |
|
|
02/17/2004 10:24:51 PM · #31 |
As long as I break a 4 with my photo, I'll be okay.
I ran out of time, and just took a semi-crappy photo. Well I was recreating a photo I once took, but wasn't able to do it in the timeframe I gave myself. I made a pledge to myself to enter every challenge. So I had to. |
|
|
02/17/2004 10:55:12 PM · #32 |
I actually like my Textures entry which in itself is an achievement for me. Only one thing bothers me.... I think I like the thumbnail better than the full picture =) go figure!
|
|
|
02/17/2004 10:59:45 PM · #33 |
I didn't enter this time because I was out of crackers!!
My old entry from 2002, that didn't do well but I still like it.
 |
|
|
02/17/2004 11:06:33 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by justine: I didn't enter this time because I was out of crackers!!
My old entry from 2002, that didn't do well but I still like it.
|
Oh, I like that one!
And you have 50 minutes still, you could get one out. |
|
|
02/17/2004 11:20:16 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by hsteg: Originally posted by visitor:
Can not wait for the voting to start.
:~) |
I submitted the day of the notice of what the challenge was, last tues, how do u think i feel? :) |
Like you, I entered on Tuesday. Good luck to all, both in the challenge, and the challenge of getting thru all the entries... 396 as of this posting.
|
|
|
02/17/2004 11:26:28 PM · #36 |
Just saw 398!! We may all have to quit our day jobs to get thru the voting on this one! I have changed mine 3 times already! |
|
|
02/17/2004 11:28:42 PM · #37 |
Ha! someone unsubmitted - wonder if I should also do the same...
|
|
|
02/17/2004 11:31:54 PM · #38 |
Now I know what Ted Williams must have felt like. |
|
|
02/18/2004 12:04:59 AM · #39 |
Looking through all the thumbnails and couldn't find a cat yet:P
|
|
|
02/18/2004 12:06:38 AM · #40 |
Originally posted by faidoi: Looking through all the thumbnails and couldn't find a cat yet:P |
you did not look hard enough:) |
|
|
02/18/2004 12:48:14 AM · #41 |
copied from Holy Smokes thread
Getting creamed already. I knew I would. Contrary to what the masses believe, texture is not necessarily bumpy, fluffy or rough.
|
|
|
02/18/2004 02:26:25 AM · #42 |
took about 2 hours to vote on them all. I commented on just over 20%.
Half of them (my commented ones) seem to be bad macro shots. To me, bad is when 2/3 of the pic is not in focus.
At least 90% are obviously 'testure' related. An improvement.
Several flowers, 2 cats, 3 or 4 reptiles, lotsa birds, jeans, catci, oranges, and strawberries. One horse. One sorta sunset.
At least my entry has none of the 'cliche's'.
And lastly, I think I vote too high...5 is average. To get below 5 from me then the pic has to be off topic, technically bad, very boring (snapshot like,etc). To get 7 or more it has to be a nice pic, one suitable for framing. This time through I think I managed 1 8, 6 or so 7s and the rest less. Overall good entries, just nothing outstanding. (excpet mine of course - LOL)
chris
|
|
|
02/18/2004 02:38:05 AM · #43 |
A texture occurs in a photograph because of the interaction between light and a three dimensional surface. Use this information to make the viewer "feel" the appearance of your subject.
Haven't voted on but about 10% so far, but so far, I'm not "feeling" much. A couple have stood out, but while a lot show something that can obviously relate to texture, not so many really evectively communicate the texture. And I totally agree with you Chris - when the purpose is to show off texture, having 2/3 (or more in some cases) of the picture out of the focal plane just doesn't acheive the effect I'm looking for. Hopefully, I just got a bad first bunch. But you're post isn't too encouraging... |
|
|
02/18/2004 02:40:01 AM · #44 |
Originally posted by orussell: copied from Holy Smokes thread
Getting creamed already. I knew I would. Contrary to what the masses believe, texture is not necessarily bumpy, fluffy or rough. | My sentiments exactly - I am heading for my lowest score am at 4.5 after 23 votes and falling.
And 411 entries voted in 120 mins - must be a speed voting record
|
|
|
02/18/2004 02:57:47 AM · #45 |
yeah i'll say.
i wasn't expecting much with this one... however.. the 4.something is STILL a little diasspointing.
|
|
|
02/18/2004 03:08:09 AM · #46 |
Originally posted by leaf: the 4.something is STILL a little diasspointing. |
Wonderful example of understatement, now is understatement a figure of speech?
:)
Message edited by author 2004-02-18 03:29:27.
|
|
|
02/18/2004 03:30:52 AM · #47 |
Makes me glad I unsubmitted, hehe. I entered my shot into the Mundane contest instead, less competition :P
|
|
|
02/18/2004 04:09:52 AM · #48 |
What was going to be the texture entry... just as well... maybe next go round...
  |
|
|
02/18/2004 08:08:51 AM · #49 |
Well, I've voted on 87 images (21%)in the past hour, and I'm on dialup. Some really nice shots, but nothing exceptional. So far, I have given one "9", several 8's and 7's but by far more 6's and 5's. I tend to vote a bit high as well - generally if it fits the challenge and is in focus and well composed, it gets at least a 4 from me. I have given one three so far - but that's usually about as low as I go unless I really feel that the photograph was intended to be offensive.
|
|
|
02/18/2004 08:18:12 AM · #50 |
Think I'll wait until I'm in a better frame of mind before I vote. At least until I get a coffee in me. Who else is below 5 (closer to 4 actually)? lol
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/05/2025 03:56:45 AM EDT.