| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/02/2007 01:13:38 PM · #101 |
Originally posted by Chinabun:
Sometimes I wish I was a man........
|
Personally, I think you make a pretty good woman :-)
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:17:01 PM · #102 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Originally posted by frisca:
I'm still ashamed of some of the men who have posted here. |
Really all of us? I was presenting the "Expectation of privacy in public" issue. Does that make me a pig and in need of your condemnation? |
No, see my bold above. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:18:19 PM · #103 |
I was gonna post something but I don't want Pam to be ashamed of me so I'll keep it to myself.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:21:07 PM · #104 |
Originally posted by NstiG8tr:
I was gonna post something but I don't want Pam to be ashamed of me so I'll keep it to myself. |
I'm ashamed of you for not posting it ;-)
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:28:24 PM · #105 |
I'm not trying to stop anyone from posting. All I am doing is trying to ensure that there is appropriate legitimacy to the objections voiced in this thread.
What I am ashamed of is the attitude that states, as if it known and established fact, everyone was joking and all those who have objected to the actions of the canon exec (the "perv") are just engaged in an exercise of histrionics.
Please do post your views, Dave. I did not mean to stop you from voicing your thoughts. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:54:14 PM · #106 |
Originally posted by frisca:
No, see my bold above. |
OK. Sorry a little selective reading on my part... |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 01:58:42 PM · #107 |
Doesn't anyone look at smoking gun???? I think this is the image he took.. My take on this is simple..
If you don't want someone viewing your crotch, then don't stick it out for everyone to see.. I would be horrified if myself or one of my girlfriends CHOSE to sit like this at a photo shoot or any other place, other then in the privacy of her own home.. Come on now.. Would you as a women be caught dead sitting in this director's chair, wearing the itty bitty skirt that obviously hides nothing in this position, and then be surprised when someone takes a picture or gawk's at you !!! Also, is this image really so shocking that it would warrant any reaction at all..
The perv's image !!!
Besides, the story is not even about this image by itself.. It's about another peron being fired for complaining about this guy taking these type's of images.. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:03:20 PM · #108 |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:03:26 PM · #109 |
That is the image?
OMG, I'm sooo effing done with this thread. That image is about as much of a non-issue as I have ever seen. Shame on Canon!
that image wasn't even worth the "This thread is worthless without pics" post.
Message edited by author 2007-11-02 14:08:16.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:08:11 PM · #110 |
| That chair looks really uncomfortable though. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:15:52 PM · #111 |
Edit - point already made.
Message edited by author 2007-11-02 14:16:42. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:16:34 PM · #112 |
edit for the edit
Message edited by author 2007-11-02 14:17:14. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:18:33 PM · #113 |
The tennis star in question promotes the products of a company that has a history of contracting with overseas factories with horrid and abusive working conditions. 90% of those factory workers are women. Surveillance cameras are all over these factories and there have been reports of sexual abuse. I would be very surprised if she was unaware of this and I just find this a little ironic given the current situation/discussion.
I read somewhere that Sharapova likes to make lots of money to help people. I certainly hope that some of that money is going towards helping the exploited workers and to changing the labor issues in those countries.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:18:47 PM · #114 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
That is the image?
OMG, I'm sooo effing done with this thread. That image is about as much of a non-issue as I have ever seen. Shame on Canon!
that image wasn't even worth the "This thread is worthless without pics" post. |
That's ok.... Muckpond will probably be locking this thread soon too.....:P Too bad, I learned alot from the invasion of privacy link...Go pats.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:20:36 PM · #115 |
the privacy discussion is a very interesting one, I agree.
I think the actual photo, while interesting, sure doesn't change my views about such photography in general, or about societal attitudes regarding women, and women who speak up. Plus I'd really call that a picture of her fanny. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:23:13 PM · #116 |
Originally posted by neophyte:
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
That is the image?
OMG, I'm sooo effing done with this thread. That image is about as much of a non-issue as I have ever seen. Shame on Canon!
that image wasn't even worth the "This thread is worthless without pics" post. |
That's ok.... Muckpond will probably be locking this thread soon too.....:P Too bad, I learned alot from the invasion of privacy link...Go pats. |
Well no Leroy has been banned from posting for a week. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:26:42 PM · #117 |
Originally posted by neophyte:
That's ok.... Muckpond will probably be locking this thread soon too.....:P Too bad, I learned alot from the invasion of privacy link...Go pats. |
for the record, the other threads were locked because they were both created for the purposes of baiting users. you guys are welcome to show your true colors and state your opinions all you want -- just keep it to one, easily-ignorable thread. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:27:09 PM · #118 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Well no Leroy has been banned from posting for a week. |
Seriously?
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:28:58 PM · #119 |
Originally posted by neophyte:
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Well no Leroy has been banned from posting for a week. |
Seriously? |
Yes |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:32:04 PM · #120 |
Originally posted by muckpond:
Originally posted by neophyte:
That's ok.... Muckpond will probably be locking this thread soon too.....:P Too bad, I learned alot from the invasion of privacy link...Go pats. |
for the record, the other threads were locked because they were both created for the purposes of baiting users. |
This is my last off topic post as this is not my fight but the assumption that he started the other thread to bait users is a stretch.
He found this link //www.amazingjokes.com/ ,thought it funny and posted it here. To me he is guilty of bad timing.
I am done thanks for understanding. |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:32:12 PM · #121 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Originally posted by neophyte:
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Well no Leroy has been banned from posting for a week. |
Seriously? |
Yes |
Wow! I'm afraid to comment on that.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:32:22 PM · #122 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Originally posted by neophyte:
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo:
Well no Leroy has been banned from posting for a week. |
Seriously? |
Yes |
LMAO
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:34:57 PM · #123 |
Originally posted by Olyuzi:
The tennis star in question promotes the products of a company that has a history of contracting with overseas factories with horrid and abusive working conditions. 90% of those factory workers are women. Surveillance cameras are all over these factories and there have been reports of sexual abuse. I would be very surprised if she was unaware of this and I just find this a little ironic given the current situation/discussion. |
You have source to substantiate this? I thought Canon was an overseas company.
|
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:44:21 PM · #124 |
Originally posted by Jimbo_for_life:
well it is disgusting that this guy is doing it, expecally because it is for some personal fantisy to it. i didnt mean for it to sound as it did, i ment it to mean at least he likes the opposite gender and wasnt some, well gay actavist. when watching tv they got these dating shows now that have "bi"sexual people, (tila tiqula's a shot at love, Next)and they actually put this on tv for people, let alone children to watch, and here we have people asking why the younger generation is so "different" or "in most need of help" from other generations and they cant see how they polute** the minds of the generation, well the whole problem is allowing garbage like this on public tv. What we reep is what we so, in all cases, i am sorry for the comment i said and i appologise if i offended anyone by saying it. Jimbo |
What a spectacularly homophobic rant. :( |
|
|
|
11/02/2007 02:46:24 PM · #125 |
Originally posted by Louis:
Originally posted by Jimbo_for_life:
well it is disgusting that this guy is doing it, expecally because it is for some personal fantisy to it. i didnt mean for it to sound as it did, i ment it to mean at least he likes the opposite gender and wasnt some, well gay actavist. when watching tv they got these dating shows now that have "bi"sexual people, (tila tiqula's a shot at love, Next)and they actually put this on tv for people, let alone children to watch, and here we have people asking why the younger generation is so "different" or "in most need of help" from other generations and they cant see how they polute** the minds of the generation, well the whole problem is allowing garbage like this on public tv. What we reep is what we so, in all cases, i am sorry for the comment i said and i appologise if i offended anyone by saying it. Jimbo |
What a spectacularly homophobic rant. :( |
indeed. :( |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/21/2025 09:52:10 AM EDT.
