DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> canon powershot G5 - user opinions
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/01/2004 02:00:53 PM · #1
curious what some G5 users think of the cameras features and functionality. i know someone interested in upgrading their digital camera - and also is used to shooting on a film slr.
but doesn't want to get into Dslr currently.

looking in the $500-600 US dollar range for a versitile and good quality
Dslr compromise.

does it take filters?
how is it's optical zoom?
how's the image quality? - i have looked a few here from the G5 - but curious of specifically direct off the camera image quality.

and any other thoughts apppreciated
thanks



01/01/2004 08:35:02 PM · #2
I like my G5 a lot. All the shots in my portfolio were done with it. It does have its limitations though.

It does take filters, either by using a lensmate(52mm or 58mm) or Canon's adapter(58mm). Canon's adapter and the 58mm lensmate all but totally block the optical viewfinder, which is pretty useless anyway. It has a 3 stop ND filter built into the lens accessible through the menus.

It's a 4x optical zoom, med wide to tele. There are optical lens attachments to extend the range, but I can't comment on those as I have never used them.

The images right out of the camera are pretty typical of Canon, a bit dark and maybe a bit warm for most people. Canon seems to favor underexposing to preserve the highlight detail. They seem to need a reasonable amount of sharpening to maximize the detail in the image. All in all, I would say they are pretty good right out of the camera, but really good with some adjustments.

The Chromatic Aberration that you hear so much about in the reviews is really not that big of an issue for me, it is easy enough to avoid or to fix in PS later if necessary.

I had a shot printed 16x20 from DPCPrints and it was gorgeous.

Some of the downsides that I have run into:

Noise at higher ISOs - pretty much a given with the small sensor size.

Lack of a shutter speed slower than 15s - This may not be an issue for most prople, but when you need a long exposure or Bulb setting, you really need it.

AF can be slow - This seems pretty typical for this type of camera, but can drive me nuts. It does have an AF assist light, I can't imagine it without one.

Shutter lag - Seems better than most, but to someone used to film SLRs, it is annoying.

If you have any more specific questions, let me know, I'll be happy to tell you what I think.
01/01/2004 08:59:12 PM · #3
cool thanks, just trying to help someone i know out.

may get back to you here if they have any questions..

01/04/2004 02:57:24 PM · #4
anyone else have any thoughts on this?
01/04/2004 03:27:03 PM · #5
you should look into the f717
01/04/2004 04:04:58 PM · #6
tend to stay away from sony products.
havent had good luck with them in the past.

not cameras so much, but never-the-less


Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 02:40:19 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 02:40:19 AM EDT.