| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/10/2007 11:14:40 PM · #1 |
silly.
Check this out.
Well technically it is a painting, but that still rocks.
Message edited by author 2007-06-10 23:18:02. |
|
|
|
06/10/2007 11:18:48 PM · #2 |
Personally I think photorealism painting is very cool, but I find it disappointing that it's so rarely used to create completely original works as oppossed to just duplicating a photograph.
Incredible skill on their part. |
|
|
|
06/10/2007 11:38:31 PM · #3 |
The reason photography does not qualify as art is that the process removes the filter of the human mind as an interpretative element. Although photography requires technical skill, in the final analysis it is only a mechanical recording of reality.
I just simply disagree on so many levels. I don't know where to begin. However, the painting is way cool! |
|
|
|
06/10/2007 11:58:44 PM · #4 |
| All I know is that it takes some serious skills. I think it is genius to be able to recreate something like that. |
|
|
|
06/11/2007 09:10:23 PM · #5 |
| I may be wrong, but I really find this hard to believe that it's a painting. If you look at the finished, large picture, at the hair, it almost looks like there is purple fringing right by the cheek.... |
|
|
|
06/11/2007 10:27:42 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Mulder:
I may be wrong, but I really find this hard to believe that it's a painting. If you look at the finished, large picture, at the hair, it almost looks like there is purple fringing right by the cheek.... |
I think that is coming from the digital image of the final painting. even a scanner is a more different camera, and have the same downfalls.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2007 10:37:11 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by gi_joe05:
Originally posted by Mulder:
I may be wrong, but I really find this hard to believe that it's a painting. If you look at the finished, large picture, at the hair, it almost looks like there is purple fringing right by the cheek.... |
I think that is coming from the digital image of the final painting. even a scanner is a more different camera, and have the same downfalls. |
Actually the artist says that he liked to artifacts created by the digital camera and decided to keep them in the painting. How convenient ;-)
|
|
|
|
06/11/2007 11:25:37 PM · #8 |
WHAT! That is pretty amazing. I mean down to the pores for detail.
|
|
|
|
06/11/2007 11:49:55 PM · #9 |
| Ya, he didn't even neat image it...lol |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/30/2025 11:06:37 AM EDT.
