| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/07/2007 09:12:27 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by harmsusmc:
Originally posted by citymars:
I seem to remember other photos that had more than three images, too, if you count three images against another image used as a background. I say let the voters decide -- as they did. |
You bring up an excellent point...Is that background a fourth image? |
Just the clarify this...I really don't mean to say a background/canvas color or whatever is really an image...To everyone really thinking this or has problems, just move on...It's not like this site is the end of the world or anything.
"Just my 2 cents worth" |
|
|
|
05/07/2007 09:26:53 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by hywind:
I would not call it a wish, more an undersatanding of the correct and incorrect triptych rule. |
well, I don't think either one of us should be dq'd! :) |
|
|
|
05/07/2007 11:00:51 PM · #28 |
This image was DQ'd in the last Triptych challenge. One of the 3 images was used as a background. Of course, it was a different set of rules. |
|
|
|
05/08/2007 07:08:15 PM · #29 |
I am really surprised that not one member of the site council has made any response to this thread to clear this issue up.
|
|
|
|
05/10/2007 09:02:21 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by hywind:
I am really surprised that not one member of the site council has made any response to this thread to clear this issue up. |
Actions speak louder than words. Vague, but loud. |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 09:16:12 PM · #31 |
I'd like to know why it took so long for those images to be DQ'ed when validation requests were put in the first day of voting. Aren't originals supposed to be submitted within 48 hours? I know SC gets lots of validation requests but something as cut and dried as using more than 3 photos doesn't seem too difficult to validate.
And on that point, I believe I read in the forums that if your image is DQ'ed you still get to keep your score, that is, it goes towards your total average. That doesn't seem right to me. You could submit an amazing photo, score really high, have it DQ'ed at the end of voting (not a self-DQ but a regular one) and your high score would benefit you, raising your average.
SC, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
05/10/2007 09:20:10 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld:
I know SC gets lots of validation requests but something as cut and dried as using more than 3 photos doesn't seem too difficult to validate. |
I didn't use more than three photos. I like to think there was some thoughtful discussion among the SC, and that some of them actually took my side in the issue.
Or maybe they're just busy. |
|
|
|
05/10/2007 10:27:29 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by harmsusmc:
Originally posted by harmsusmc:
Originally posted by citymars:
I seem to remember other photos that had more than three images, too, if you count three images against another image used as a background. I say let the voters decide -- as they did. |
You bring up an excellent point...Is that background a fourth image? |
Just the clarify this...I really don't mean to say a background/canvas color or whatever is really an image...To everyone really thinking this or has problems, just move on...It's not like this site is the end of the world or anything.
"Just my 2 cents worth" |
But if you add a background and put a borber around it you are adding image area, which is not allowed.
You may not use ANY editing tool to create new image area, objects or features (such as lens flare or motion) that didn't already exist in your original capture. You may not use ANY editing tool to move, remove or duplicate any element of your photograph that would change a typical viewer's description of the photograph (aside from color), even if the tool is otherwise legal, and regardless of whether you intended the change when the photograph was taken.
I take your images are not DQ'd
Message edited by author 2007-05-10 22:28:49.
|
|
|
|
05/10/2007 10:36:14 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by hywind:
But if you add a background and put a borber around it you are adding image area, which is not allowed. |
what about blending three images, as some people did? blended images don't have borders between them, so in effect you are "adding image area" to each individual photo. There are other examples of a plain background with three photos on it. It's not merely a border in that case. There is no clear way to apply advanced editing rules to a combination of three images. I really don't understand what purpose is served by dq'ing either of us. I realize that people in a competition like to be sure they are competing under the same rules and restrictions, but there is no clarity here anyway. |
|
|
|
05/11/2007 01:21:36 AM · #35 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Originally posted by hywind:
But if you add a background and put a borber around it you are adding image area, which is not allowed. |
what about blending three images, as some people did? blended images don't have borders between them, so in effect you are "adding image area" to each individual photo. There are other examples of a plain background with three photos on it. It's not merely a border in that case. There is no clear way to apply advanced editing rules to a combination of three images. I really don't understand what purpose is served by dq'ing either of us. I realize that people in a competition like to be sure they are competing under the same rules and restrictions, but there is no clarity here anyway. |
What you are saying is true about blending three images, if part of one laps into the other this could be seen as creating new image area.
I sent a sample of this before the challenge closed for voting, and was recommended by site council not to use this method.
|
|
