DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> What should i get (lenses)
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 13 of 13, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 04/24/2007 05:02:37 PM · #1
Well im headed off to California tomorrow, making a stop in Seattle for to pick up a lens. I need a few ideas, im going to be shooting a variety of things really, im thinking of the Tamrom 28-75mm/2.8 but if i cant find that one, what are some other options in the same price range $400-$550USD? I want something fast, and sharp while not breaking the budget. Thoughts?
 04/24/2007 05:12:47 PM · #2
What are you shooting?
For indoors,museums, and such the tamron 17-50 2.8 is good and in your price range. A good bit wider than the 28-75.
My favorite all around walkabout lens is the tamron 24-135 SP. It's in the price range, has great range and macro too - very sharp as well, but it's not 'fast' or a constant aperture.
Canon's 17-85 with IS isn't fas either and may be beyond your budget, but it's not bad, and has nice macro too.
 04/24/2007 05:31:12 PM · #3
Mostly outdoor shots, sightseeing stuff, going to the beaches etc. Not many indoor shots except perhaps this one church thing thats there thats supposed to be cool. I suppose if its bright enough i wont need the 2.8, but it would still be nice to have for when it get a little darker.

Im thinking almost something a little wider even, The Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM looks nice. I looked at a few of these, there all in my price range, just not 100% sure what i want more, large range, or wide angle:

Tamron 28-75/2.8
Canon EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM

Message edited by author 2007-04-24 17:45:11.
 04/24/2007 06:03:25 PM · #4
go with the Tamron 28-75 for sure if it is there. It is one of my favs. so far.

04/24/2007 06:11:25 PM · #5
If you want something fast and wide in that range you could go with the Tamron 17-50 2.8, its still in your price range I believe. It is fairly wide and still 2.8 throughout. The Sigma is not made for lowlight without a tripod, but if your outdoors at the beach and sightseeing stuff it would definitely hav plenty of light. I have the Tamron 28-75 and its excellent but just not as wide as I want.
 04/24/2007 06:21:28 PM · #6
Now im torn lol, I dont know what i want haha. the 17-50 and 28-75 are both nice, larger range and constant 2.8 aperture. Would the 17-50 be suitable for scenery shots, ie// sunsets and such? I know ill want to do a few of those. Ive never been to california so im not sure what ill want more of once im down there, wide angle or a bit more range. Perhaps 17mm will be good enough while im there. Is it pretty sharp (the 17-50)?

Im really likeing the reviews the 17-50 is getting, Ill keep that at the top of my list

Message edited by author 2007-04-24 18:36:40.
 04/25/2007 03:33:10 AM · #7
As nice as the Tamron 28-75 may be, I wouldn't recommend it for the typical walking around vacation shots as it's too long.
I'd recommend something wider such as the Tamron 17-50, Sigma 18-50 f2.8Macro, or a Sigma 17-70.

Good luck
 04/25/2007 03:48:16 AM · #8
28-75 tamron's an awesome lens on a full frame camera, but with a standard crop factor camera, I'd reccomend sticking with the 17-50... you get to keep the 2.8 aperture, but its noticeably wider. remember, its a lot easier to crop a picture to zoom in, rather than having to make a panorama of multiple pictures because your lens wasn't wide enough

For a standard walkaround, i reckon the 17-50 wins
 04/25/2007 03:48:56 AM · #9
I say you should only go for the 17-50 if you are planning on getting rid of your kit lens as it would be rendered useless. If you get the 28-75 then you will still be able to go as wide as 18 if you have the kit lens with you.
 04/25/2007 10:55:01 AM · #10
Originally posted by skylercall:
I say you should only go for the 17-50 if you are planning on getting rid of your kit lens as it would be rendered useless. If you get the 28-75 then you will still be able to go as wide as 18 if you have the kit lens with you.


ya i think im gunna do that, get the 17-50. My kit lens is gunna be either sold or chucked. Is it possible to get anything for those kit lenses one ebay? Ill see yall in 10 days, leaving for seatle now, then to the airport tomorrow morning. Later ;)
 04/25/2007 11:09:52 AM · #11
I found the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 a tad soft at the wide end but comes into its own glory around f4 and is very nice indeed, it is a good focal range too for general use. The Tamron version is really nice too.

Have you considered buy used?.. you MAY be able to get both within your budget. I got my Nikon 17-35 used and it seldom leaves my D200..

Sorry but the Canon kit lens is not very good and the Tamron or the Sigma will beat it into the ground for contrast, colour and sharpness too IMO.

Happy shopping though, its always nice getting new toys
 04/25/2007 12:23:53 PM · #12
Originally posted by kawana:


Tamron 28-75/2.8
Canon EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM


FOr the beach...a 500 with IS for the eye candy closeups LOL

On your list above - the first is good.
The second should be avoided, soft lens, old tech, you can do better optically.
third i've heard decent reports on. I have the canon 10-22 and indoors it's great. For landscapes, especially at night, not good. Not sure if it's a typical part of a super wide, but suspect it is. The Tokina 12-24 is very nice and affordable too. Super sharp and a constant F4. I had the extra money and went with the slightly wider canon.
Last lens..it has USM which is good.


04/25/2007 12:56:51 PM · #13
In looking at the Tammys

If the SP 17-50mm is as sharp as the Tamron SP 28-75mm 2.8 and the Tamron SP 17-35mm 2.8-4 then I would say that would be they way to go.

The Tammys I use are:

SP 11-18mm for architech and way wide fun almost (little warp with the crop factor of the 20D) fisheye type stuff

SP 17-35mm this is my indoor lens for group type events and outdoor landscapes.

SP 28-75mm this is my walk around for outdoor events/festivals and indoor close-ups (I find I take more shots near the 75mm end of this lens).

If you can have the best of both worlds 17-35 and 28-75 then the 17-50mm might just be the way to go. (I would miss the 50-75mm range myself)

Question: I see you still have your kit lens listed, what is wrong with that for Landscape/Outdoor type stuff where you can bump the f/stop and get some decent shots?

Message edited by author 2007-04-25 12:57:34.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/01/2026 09:44:50 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/01/2026 09:44:50 AM EST.